[ Quote ]

Responding to Carmen B. Stiller: Part 3 (Mormon God became Child)

Another topic she tries to open up about is God's existence and nature. Below are her words and how she attempted to silence the LDS teaching. But the question is, does she really knows what the message was all about? Text in Green are her comments, let's go -

Jerry Nuñez Bustillo
Niño S. Tandoy

"ANG DIYOS NG MGA MORMON AY NAGING BATA AT TAO. MAAARING ANG DIYOS NILA NOON AY ISANG BATA AT TAONG KATULAD NATIN!"

Ganito ang nakasulat sa aklat nila: Sa Tagalog na lang dahil mahaba pag sa English.

"Alalahanin natin na ang Diyos na nasa langit ay maaaring dati'y isang bata at mortal na katulad natin, at unti-unting umangat ng antas sa paaralan ng pag-unlad, nagpatuloy at nagtagumpay, hanggang marating ang rurok na Kaniyang kinalalagyan ngayon. Sa kanilang aklat, He that Receiveth My Servants Receiveth Me---Melchizedek Priesthood Personal Study Guide 1979-80, p. 82.

I don't know where did they got this source and I don't know if this represents the LDS view or the authors view. But let's make an attempt to answer her commentary, which is not actually her's rather a copied idea from some INC known Pasugo Editions.

So here's my idea and look closely to the word "Maaring dati'y isang bata...". Did you catch it? That word "Maaring" which simply means "maybe" in English seems a little awkward in making it a doctrine. To me personally, and since we don't believe in just limited life cycle rather a One Eternal Round. That doesn't sounds contradictions or perhaps false. Christ said that -

John 5:19 Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.

I don't know how it goes, and how did Christ saw a past experience of His Father which he simply mimics on his days. You may disagree with me but I don't see any good answer on Christ's words about the nature of God the Father.

Naniniwala ang mga Mormon na nagbabago daw ang kanilang Diyos sakalagayan. Mula raw sa kalagayang bata ay naging tao raw at naging Diyos.

That is plausible, no one has ever been to carbon date God's Existence and the things happened before biblical times. The scriptures said that their were already heaven, and heaven of heavens existed before our present world. Then what's with those other heavens out there? Were there creations too in some other celestial Dimension? LOL! Oh well, who knows? And will of course it's an opinion. That's how it was on the quote that you didn't even bother looking up the rest of the text, and see how you fail to understand it.

"ANG PAGTUTURO NG BULAANG PROPETA NG MORMON AY SUMASALUNGAT SA SINASABI NG DIYOS NA:

Malakias 3:6 (ADB1905)
"Sapagka't ako, ang Panginoon, ay hindi nababago,"

"ANG DIYOS ANG NAGPAHAYAG NA SIYA AY HINDI NABABAGO---NI ANINO NG PAG-IIBA AY WALANG PAGBABAGO SA KANIYA."

Basically yes, but you're taking it out of context. For instance this scripture says this -

Ezekiel 24:14 I the LORD have spoken it: it shall come to pass, and I will do it; I will not go back, neither will I spare, neither will I repent; according to thy ways, and according to thy doings, shall they judge thee, saith the Lord GOD.

Versus to this one - 

Jonah 3:10 ¶ And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented of the evil, that he had said that he would do unto them; and he did it not.

Does it sounds unchangeable to you? He said that he would do something, but he did nothing. It really sounds something else. But that does mean he is changeable God? No, of course cause there were reasons behind it.

See how you simply misguided by your own self-esteemed and lost the important detail. Clearly you never know the nature of God.

Santiago 1:17 (MBB)
"Ang lahat ng mabuti at ganap na kaloob ay buhat sa Diyos, mula sa Ama na lumikha ng mga tanglaw sa kalangitan. Hindi siya nagbabago, o nagdudulot ng bahagya mang dilim dahil sa pagbabago."

Osea 11:9 (ABTAG1978)
"Hindi ko isasagawa ang kabangisan ng aking galit, hindi ako babalik upang ipahamak ang Ephraim: sapagka't ako'y Dios, at hindi tao;"

Mga Bilang 23:19 (ADB1905)
"Ang Dios ay hindi tao na magsisinungaling, Ni anak ng tao na magsisisi;"

I don't know what are you up to using some verses that has nothing to do with the subject. But if you think this is a good topic to dismiss my belief, sorry about it. I don't take advice to someone who can't even use the right context.

Thank you and have a nice day.

Jerry Nuñez Bustillo

Comment Section

Back to Top

Comment down below using your Facebook account. Don't Hesitate to contact me anytime, you can visit my other social media account to Learn more about Me.