VANESSA by Sander71113

VANESSA

by Deuce, updated by Me


OVERVIEW

Vanessa's Key Features
- Originally made by "Deuce", Updated
- Based on KOF 2K
- Optional A.I. levels (Hard, Medium, NoAI)
- KOF gameplay accurate
- WinMUGEN compatible (Tnx Winane)

MUGEN Vanessa is based off KOF2001.

VERSION 0.8 UPDATES

* February 12, 2005
- Win Mugen compatible, single file download.

* March 19, 2002
- All her moves are in.
- This Vanessa uses the same modified ADV groove system that Deuce used for all his characters, so there is no counter/armor mode.

DOWNLOADS

vanessa.rar - February 12, 2005

BENIMARU NIKAIDO by Sander71113

BENIMARU NIKAIDO

by Deuce, updated by Me.

Benimaru Nikaido's Key Features:
- Originally made by "Deuce", Updated
- Edited sprites by "Kaddet"
- Based on KOF 98-2K2, CVS1-2
- Optional A.I. levels (Hard, Medium, NoAI)
- KOF gameplay accurate
- Some custom moves added
- WinMUGEN compatible (Tnx Winane)


Features:
MUGEN Benimaru Nikaido has all his moves from KOF 95 up to 2001. Includes the same 3 level A.I., plus an option to use the “purle” lightning color when using his alternative palettes (hold start when selecting).

Please take the time to read the included documentation. A new DM was included, inspired by CVS.

VERSION 1.0 UPDATES

* February 12, 2005
- Win Mugen compatible, single file download, fixed some bugs.
* November 22, 2002
- Redone Cvs DM.. Thanks to KADDET for the awesome edits. ^^
- Tweaked the iai geri follow up to match KOF2001.

DOWNLOADS

Benimaru.rar - February 12, 2005

IORI YAGAMI BY Sander71113

IORI YAGAMI

FEATURES

This MUGEN Iori Yagami X is taken from the KOF SERIES (95-2001). This is based mostly on KOF2K1.

Definitely a worthy rival of Kyo Kusanagi, Iori has it all: style, attitude, very effective moves and not to mention crazy antics. He has a lot of combos, so either research a bit, or watch his AI beat the crap out of you (assisting suicide? :P). Please take the time to read the accompanying documentations to enjoy him better.

VERSION 0.99 UPDATES

February 12, 2005
- Win MUGEN compatible, single file download.

DOWNLOAD

Iori.rar - February 12, 2005 - 1.89MB

Wolverine by Sander71113

Wolverine

FEATURES

Wolverine's Key Features
- Based on Xmen,Marvel, XMvSF,MvC
- Optional A.I. levels (Hard, Medium, NoAI)
- Good Accuracy
- Custom moves added
- WinMUGEN compatible (Tnx Winane)

VERSION 1.0 UPDATES

February 12, 2005
- Win Mugen compatible, single file download.

January 3, 2002
- Final Release
- HyperBgs added (optional)
- Tech hit
- Fixes

Back Stab – Tornado Finisher

Back Stab – Multiple Dash

Back Stab - Stab

Back Stab – Up Front

Back Stab - Start Up

VS a WIP!

Lets Go Bub!

FEATURES:

Wolverine was mainly ripped from "Marvel Super Heroes". I then added the extra moves from "Xmen vs Street fighter" and "Marvel Vs Capcom". His -gameplay- is based on "MvC". I dunno if I'll update him into his MVC2 incarnation, maybe if I play with it a bit more.

There is a “hidden” super somewhere, don’t ask me about it though /gg. His AI is notably… crazy, I refer to it as “pattern based - turtle” AI. Am planning to improve it more so you can’t exploit the pattern weaknesses. Please take the time to read the accompanying docs.

DOWNLOAD

wolverine.rar - February 12, 2005 - 1.26MB

Kyo Kusanagi by Sander71113

Kyo Kusanagi

VERSION: 1.5

Kyo Kusanagi's Key Features: - Choose old or new costume
- Edited sprites by 'Kaddet'
- Multiple Modes (From KOF 95-2K2)
- Multiple Grooves (Extra, Adv, 2K1 etc..)
- Optional A.I. levels (Hard, Medium, NoAI)
- KOF gameplay accurate
- Some custom moves added - WinMUGEN compatible (Tnx Winane)

FEATURES

Kyo Kusanagi is taken from SNK's King of Fighters Series. All of his varying moves and abilities from KOF'94 to KOF'20012 are made available. An all in one Kyo, which gives the user the power to choose between the many different modes and grooves that KOF has implemented.

Just an added note, Mix and 2K1 mode uses KOF2K1 damages, and the rest uses KOF98 based damage.

Please take the time to read the accompanying docs on how to switch between grooves and modes.

MODES

KOF '95, KOF '98, Kyo-1, Kyo-2, KOF '99, KOF '2000, KOF '2001, KOF MIX MODE

GROOVES

Advance Groove, Extra Groove, KOF'99 Groove, KOF '2000 Groove, KOF '2001 Groove, Mix Groove

STRIKERS

Another Iori, Kyoko, Syo, Saisyu, Benimaru, Daimon, Shingo,

Artificial Intelligence

Hard level, Medium level, Low Level

STORY BOARD

KOF 97 SPECIAL ENDING, KOF2000 ENDING

DOWNLOAD LINK

KUSANAGI.RAR - February 12, 2005 - 9.23MB

TERRY BOGARD by Sander71113

TERRY BOGARD

FEATURES:

Terry Bogard's Key Features:
- Based on KOF95-2K2, CVS1-2,GMOTW
- Edited sprites by "Kaddet"
- Optional A.I. levels (Hard, Medium, NoAI)
- Absolutely KOF gameplay accurate
- A lot of custom moves added
- WinMUGEN compatible (Tnx Winane)

As usual, We tried to make Terry as accurately as possible, having exact vels and clsns. I can say with a smile that this Terry passed my crazy standards.

I've improved the AI so you will be seeing some cool KOF strategies like “jump then low kicks”.

Also, don't be surprised to see stuff from Garou Mark of the Wolves, it inspired the EX special attacks. Originally, this is intended to have Multiple Mode and Grooves ala NEOKYOX, but this release is locked in MIX mode and MIX Groove.

NOTES:

A joint project with 'Maximillian JEnus'.
Sprite edits by 'Kaddet'.
WinMugen compatible.

VERSION: 1.0
LAST UPDATED: FEB 12, 2005
DATE RELEASED: JUNE 7, 2003
GAMES: KOF '98–2003, Garou MOTW, CvS 1 & 2
MUGEN VERSION: 041401, WinMugen

EX POWER WAVE

EX BURN KNUCKLE

EX POWER CHARGE

BUSTER WOLF

DOWNLOAD

Terry.rar — February 12, 2005

Kompleto na ang Bibliya - by Ginoong Pantas

Kung nagbabasa ka lang sana ng Biblia, Marites… hindi ka mahihirapang hagilapin ang sagot sa tanong mong iyan.👎Pero sige, sino nga ba ang nagsabi, at kanino galing ang katotohanang ang BIBLIA ay KUMPLETO at para sa IKAKUKUMPLETO ng mga hinirang ng Diyos na lubusang bumabatay ng aral mula rito?

Seriously Ginoong Pantas. Just because of the level of understand to a person you're dealing with, then for sure the conclusion is fixed. She is not reading a scriture specially the Bible? Really, Ginoong Pantas? So your conclusion is based on just a mere understanding of ones knowledge of scriptural eisegesis, am I right Ginoong Pantas. So what about lets test it here, if you understand your Bible well according to your version of truth.

Ang Biblia mismo ang may sabi niyan:

“Even when you were a child, you already knew the message of the Bible. The Bible has taught you how you can be truly wise. You understand that God saves you because you believe in Christ Jesus. EVERYTHING THAT IS WRITTEN IN THE BIBLE COMES FROM GOD’S SPIRIT. It helps us in many ways. THE BIBLE TEACHES US WHAT IS TRUE. It warns us when we are doing wrong things. It shows us what is right. It teaches us how to live good lives.” (2ⁿᵈ Timothy 3:15-16, ᴇᴇʙ)

Okay, so tell me the context of the verses that you posted? Who was the speaker and to whom it was addressed? And tell me, what's the Paul referring to a writing during this statement? Can you tell me what it is Ginoong Pantas?

Let me answer that question for you Ginoong Pantas then tell me if I'm wrong using the same context of this passage. 

“Every scripture inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness: that the man of God may be COMPLETE, FURNISHED COMPLETELY unto every good work.” (2ⁿᵈ Timothy 3:16-17, ᴇʀᴠ)

So when Paul told timothy about the scriptures; does this automatically meant about the entire Bible of our times? Really?

Ngayon, ikaw naman Marites. ANO ang matibay mong patotoo na BUKOD SA BIBLIA ay may iniuutos pa ang Diyos, o si Cristo, o ang mga Apostol, na MAGBATAY sa mga literaturang OUTSIDE the canonized portions of the Holy Scriptures, gaya ng Book of Mormon at ng Pearl of Great Price?🙂 Sana lang ay masagot mo iyan nang makatotohanan.

Thinking that she can't prove anything does it meant your have quoted the right context of the scripture, Ginoong Pantas? Just when did Christ and the apostles said that this was all about the bible that we use in our days?

Let's take a look at this example from the scriptures that Christ quoted -

Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me - John 5:39

When Christ quoted this, does it meant it was the entire Bible or was it the available writings during Christ time. Take not that the scriptures during Christ ministry was no other that the Tanakh which composed of Torah, Nevi'im and Ketuvim, and those were the only primary source of their writings that they quoted often. Now riddle this, Ginoong Pantas; How come Christ said that those writings were the source that they could think about eternal life? Why did Christ use the old writings will be the guide to their salvation, and yet we don't have the New Testament at this time, Ginoong Pantas? Paul is not even known or was called during this time. So yes, we are not talking about the whole bible here, Ginoong Pantas? Not even John who wrote the revelations said anything about the Bible as the final authority. You just simple don't know your scripture will, Ginoong Pantas and I would suggest to study it more fully the going around the social media scattering your ideology that you don't even know the context.

When Christ was dead in 3 days no one was able to worship the Father because you can only worship the Father through Christ?

---

And here's another False Dichotomy from our friendly INC neighborhood Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. Without further adieu let's dive in.

Jerry Nuñez Bustillo-You agree that if without Christ you can't worship the Father.

Just clear the statement Jose Rodelio Retome Rata since you're too slow to understand a simple statement. We worship the Father THROUGH Christ. It's Biblical and every Christ Believing religion understand the role of Christ as the mediator to the father. Obviously, this leads to pointless argument of yours thinking that we can't worship the Father since we are dependent to his Son Jesus Christ, which is actually not an issue. Again, I'll let you have my position on this using some biblical lines below -

• 1 Timothy 2:5 - one mediator between God and men
• John 14:6 - no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
• Hebrews 13:15 - By him therefore let us offer the sacrifice of praise to God continually, that is, the fruit of our lips giving thanks to his name.
• Ephesians 2:18 - For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.
• Colossians 3:17 - do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God and the Father by him.

Screenshot from my response on one of his selections on the Comment section.

So was it an issue Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

When Christ was dead in 3 days no one was able to worship the Father because you can only worship the Father through Christ?

And here's the False Dilemma; thinking as if Christ existences did vanish right after his death. How many INC still believe this kind of ideology and teachings? The Spirit and nature of God will never cease and remains Constant or unchanged. And here's Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, thought that the spirit will also die with the Body of Christ on the tomb. This was actually one of their iconic trump cards when debating or discussing to shut down the opposing party. But actually, one of the poorest line when taken the core of the biblical context.

Yes or No?

Really? a YES or NO on a question that you couldn't even answer, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

Jerry Nuñez Bustillo-When Christ worship the Father he worship himself first because he can only worship the Father through him?

Oh, yeah sure. So why do you need Christ? Why do  you name your church as "Iglesia Ni Cristo" what's the point of keep Christ name while he has no role in your religion Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

Yes or No?

Again, You have to provide your stand about this before giving me a question that is even more questionable on your side, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. And obviously you don't know the scripture well. Try to answer that with Yes or No on the same given question and Let's deal with the result. You will figure out that you'd been conned by your ministers who don't even know the scriptural context.

John 4:22 Complete Jewish Bible

22 You people don’t know what you are worshipping; we worship what we do know, because salvation comes from the Jews.

And this has nothing to do with the subject. It seems like as always that you just keep posting on just random verses just to fell space of your commentary while ended up senseless, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata.

The SPIRITS are DEAD? - by Jose Rodelio Retome Rata

Here we are again with our friend of the Philippines Religion; representing Jose Rodelio Retome Rata! Around of applause please! 👏🏻😁

Now here another one of his bandwagon 

Jerry Nuñez Bustillo Another FUN FACT regarding your teaching!

The SPIRITS are DEAD?

1 Timothy 1:7 Easy-to-Read Version

7 They want to be teachers of the law,[a] but they don’t know what they are talking about. They don’t even understand the things they say they are sure of.

Just when in the world did I teach that the Spirits are Dead. This is one of his misunderstood ideology without thinking he was just simply deceiving himself. If you have things to address Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, be sure to back it up with the source so we could look at it and see if this has been taught as doctrine. So far you just simply trolling around without anything to prove. Why would an INC a Philippines Religion do that?

The scriptures teach that when we physically die, our spirit lives on. It separates from the body and lives in the postmortal spirit world. During the Resurrection, our spirit is reunited with our body, “never to be divided; thus the whole becoming spiritual and immortal.”

Source: https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/spirit?lang=eng

When Jesus died his body was in the grave while his spirit was active in the realm of the dead or in the grave? - by Jose Rodelio Retome Rata

Ito na naman ang isa sa mga katangs ng ating  kaibigang INC defender na si Jose Rodelio Retome Ratangs. 😅 Tingnan natin kung anong mapupulot nating makabangong Kaalaman mula sa kay Jose Rodelio Retome Rata -

Jerry Nuñez Bustillo-Another FUN FACT regarding your teaching.

When Jesus died his body was in the grave while his spirit was active in the realm of the dead or in the grave?

Buti alam mo na teaching ko, kasi ako di ko alam Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, 😆. So noong nandun ang katawan ni Kristo sa Tomb o libingan, pati pala kaluluwa nanatili dun, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Yan ba turo sa 'yo ng ministro mo Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

He was teaching to the dead in the grave while he was dead?

Isn't it FUN FACT?

Fun Fact talaga! Biruin mo ba naman literal mo initindi na nagtuturo sa mga nakahigang bangkay. Sino ba naman hindi matawa nyan Jose sa makitid mong utak?

The bible taught that the spirit return to God which the God is in heaven.

Yun naman pala eh, So anong problema mo kung bumalik mga spirito sa lugar kung saan sila nararapat ibig mo bang sabihin patay parin sila o bangkay nung pinuntahan sila ni Christo sa Mundo ng mga Spirito -

18 For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit.

19 After being made alive, he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits— 1 Peter 3:18-19 (NIV)

Ecclesiastes 12:7 King James Version

7 Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.

Jerry Nuñez Bustillo-Where is the grave- is it in heaven where the spirit return to God where the God is?

Yung ang nakakatawa Jose; Kilan ko ba sinabi na ang grave andun sa langit? May laman pa ba utak mo Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? O baka ito na naman siguro yung humuhugot ka ng salitang di mo naman pala naintindihan? Oh di ba Fun Fact Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, sino ba naman kasi di matawa sa unawa mong napakahina.

Psalm 115:3 King James Version

3 But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.

What's the relation of Psalm 115:3 of this issue Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? You are almost as close to contradicting your statement. So you believe the spirit will return to heaven, but you don't believe that they will see God. Ano yun, Jose?

Screenshot from one of his collection
that he didn't even know what the commenter meant.

For this is the reason the gospel was preached even to those who are now dead, so that they might be judged according to human standards in regard to the body, but live according to God in regard to the spirit. 1 Peter 4:6

See what he mean Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? He made his point clear that those who died their spirit was active and in the Realms of the dead, ibig sabihin sa mundo (lugar, sphere, or domain. O ayan kinompleto ko na) ng mga namatay na, pero pagakaunawa mo lugar ng mga nasa hukay o mga bangkay. Di ba Fun Fact yan Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

Mormon was there during Christ's ministry here on earth because he has the record of the teachings of Christ? - By Jose Rodelio Retome Rata

And here we are again in one of Jose Rodelio Retome Rata's obvious misunderstood cherry-picking ideology. This is the problem of INC members who were not taught by their minister how to understand text, content and context even in a simple case it was hard for them to comprehend. So let's welcome Jose Rodelio Retome Rata's example of Poor Reading Comprehension. Let dive in -

Mormon 9:22-23

22 For behold, thus said Jesus Christ, the Son of God, unto his disciples who should tarry, yea, and also to all his disciples, in the hearing of the multitude: Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature;

23 And he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved, but he that believeth not shall be damned;

All LDS church members: Is Mormon was there during Christ's ministry here on earth because he has the record of the teachings of Christ?

Okay, so tell us about this Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. Do you know that you already quoted parts of Christ appearce to the ancient America and his teaching to the People. And still missed that part because of you Cherry-Picked program. Also, did it says ALL the record of Christ? The only thing I know was that Christ taught things necessary for salvation and those are the principles ordinances of the Gospel and the Gospel Law. Check out one of the quote about the Gospel (3 Nephi 27:13-27) - 

13 Behold I have given unto you my gospel, and this is the gospel which I have given unto you—that I came into the world to do the will of my Father, because my Father sent me.

14 And my Father sent me that I might be lifted up upon the cross; and after that I had been lifted up upon the cross, that I might draw all men unto me, that as I have been lifted up by men even so should men be lifted up by the Father, to stand before me, to be judged of their works, whether they be good or whether they be evil—

15 And for this cause have I been lifted up; therefore, according to the power of the Father I will draw all men unto me, that they may be judged according to their works.

16 And it shall come to pass, that whoso repenteth and is baptized in my name shall be filled; and if he endureth to the end, behold, him will I hold guiltless before my Father at that day when I shall stand to judge the world.

17 And he that endureth not unto the end, the same is he that is also hewn down and cast into the fire, from whence they can no more return, because of the justice of the Father.

18 And this is the word which he hath given unto the children of men. And for this cause he fulfilleth the words which he hath given, and he lieth not, but fulfilleth all his words.

19 And no unclean thing can enter into his kingdom; therefore nothing entereth into his rest save it be those who have washed their garments in my blood, because of their faith, and the repentance of all their sins, and their faithfulness unto the end.

20 Now this is the commandment: Repent, all ye ends of the earth, and come unto me and be baptized in my name, that ye may be sanctified by the reception of the Holy Ghost, that ye may stand spotless before me at the last day.

21 Verily, verily, I say unto you, this is my gospel; and ye know the things that ye must do in my church; for the works which ye have seen me do that shall ye also do; for that which ye have seen me do even that shall ye do;

22 Therefore, if ye do these things blessed are ye, for ye shall be lifted up at the last day.

23 Write the things which ye have seen and heard, save it be those which are forbidden.

24 Write the works of this people, which shall be, even as hath been written, of that which hath been.

25 For behold, out of the books which have been written, and which shall be written, shall this people be judged, for by them shall their works be known unto men.

26 And behold, all things are written by the Father; therefore out of the books which shall be written shall the world be judged.

27 And know ye that ye shall be judges of this people, according to the judgment which I shall give unto you, which shall be just. Therefore, what manner of men ought ye to be? Verily I say unto you, even as I am.

This was written earlier than Mormon or it was recorded during Christ appearance to the Land of America and it was Christ himself who made that declaration, and of course, it was handed down from generation to generations.

4 Nephi 1:48 And it came to pass that when three hundred and twenty years had passed away, Ammaron, being constrained by the Holy Ghost, did hide up the records which were sacred—yea, even all the sacred records which had been handed down from generation to generation, which were sacred—even until the three hundred and twentieth year from the coming of Christ.

It was the same Ammaron who passed the record that they kept which include the words of Christ during his visit. So basically, they have safely kept it while you, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata cherry picked some part, missed the important detail of this record. So tell me Jose Rodelio Retome Rata; was this all about the Sola Scriptura issue that you can't even defined? Or more accurately it is just one of the misunderstood study of your INC religion?

So tell us Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, will Christ teachings different from his teaching to the near east audience? If so, then what would Christ taught if he will come in your Philippine Religion? So How do you define Gospel and what was the message of the Gospel, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

If the Father is the only wise God what kind of God is Jesus? - by Jose Rodelio Retome Rata

And here we are again, called out in one of  Jose Rodelio Retome Rata's failed understanding of Biblical Exegesis. And he was talking to someone as if I know and will just go ahead and stick to it thinking his ideology might be interesting. His main issue is actually the Title of Christ which is right after the quote that he thinks was hard to dispute. So let's get it on, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata -

3 Nephi 11:13-14

13 And it came to pass that the Lord spake unto them saying:

14 Arise and come forth unto me, that ye may thrust your hands into my side, and also that ye may feel the prints of the nails in my hands and in my feet, that ye may know that I am the God of Israel, and the God of the whole earth, and have been slain for the sins of the world.

If the Father is the only wise God what kind of God is Jesus?

It's actually a good question so let's ask the Bible about this Matter -

The God of Israel -

Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God. - Isaiah 44:6

Compare that with -

12 And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.

13 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.

...

16 I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star. Revelations 22:12-16

So, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata; who was the LORD the King of Israel or more accurately the God of Israel who holds the same title as the Alpha and Omega on this passage, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? So you see here, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata; Jesus Christ does not hold just one title, he has a multiple title the proves his divinity as the Son of God.

Let's add some more to help Jose Rodelio Retome Rata about this Subject.

• Compare this John 8:58 with Exodus 3:14, then tell me Jose Rodelio Retome Rata; Who was the "I AM" that they're talking about? And how come Christ made such statement?
• Compare this Matthew 1:23 to Isaiah 7:14, then again tell me Jose Rodelio Retome Rata; Who was the Immanuel and what does them meant to them?
• Now Compare this John 10:11-14 to Ezekiel 34 Tell us about who was the Good Sheeper they are talking about?
• And tell us about John 20:28 who was Thomas here addresses to? And stop that excuses that Thomas was just shock so he wrongfully address the Savior that way. That's not gonna work.
• And what about Zechariah 9:9 and Matthew 21:1-11, so who was this King who rode the donkey Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Tell us about their understanding of the Zechariah

Now Tell me Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. What was this all about? Why did Chris claim to have this fulfilled through him the it seems like it was blasphemy, or I would rather say it's sacrilege. Do you accept this as the fulfillment of Christ Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Or maybe just another idea of your study that it was a wrong translation of the bible? Go ahead tell us.

Screenshot from his cherry-picked post only the part that he failed to understand.

IBA Philippines Stake: WSR Class Graduate

We graduate not just to succeed, but to serve. WSR Class—ready to make a difference! Congratulations!

Jesus hasn't come down yet for the second time - by Jose Rodelio Retome Rata

Here Jose Rodelio Retome Rata made a clear statement as one of the excuse about Christ won't show to anyone since it is a question to Felix Manalo's authority and his self-proclaim that he was the Prophet or Sugo of the Last day, but he can't prove it. So Jose Rodelio Retome Rata made a scape plan to avoid the issue. The problem is; did the scripture really translate it that way or was it just he is using it without understanding the context? Let's find out -

Hebrews 10:10-13 King James Version

10 By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

11 And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins:

12 But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God;

13 From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool.

The teaching of the Bible Jesus ascended ONCE into heaven and sat down at the right hand of God. Since that time he waits for his enemies to be made his footstool.

Does Hebrews 10:10-13 said anything about his coming the second time? Or was it all about the atonement man to finish the works of the Law? Take note Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, we do believe and accept the teaching about Christ as the last sacrifice to end the laws, no question to it. But this has nothing to do of his second coming or even to continue the work of salvation and continues revelation. Seems like you don't know what scriptures you need to quote to justify Felix Manalo's self-proclaimed prophecy.

 

Acts 3:20-21 King James Version

20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you:

21 Whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.

Jesus hasn't come down yet for the second time.

We understand you, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata; but this has nothing to do with your claim. This was all about the restitution of all things that will soon be fulfilled, we normally call it restoration. This is not all about the second coming issue, or rather the first vision issue, nothing at all. So to me, you just keep looking up random words just to make up something to help your Felix Manalo avoid the issue of his calling that he cannot sustain. Again, this is just a random Joke of your arrogant bigotry.

Hebrews 9:28 King James Version

28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.

The teaching of the LDS church from the made up fairy book of their prophet after Jesus resurrection he descended from heaven to the ancient America and ascended again into heaven.

And what this has to do with the claim that Christ Appears in Ancient America. And it seems like your word play game still lacks its ground to support it, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. Hebrews 9:29 is once again as understood clearly was his atonement for all right after he performs it, and we do believe he will come again the second time which is obviously we call Second Coming. And thinking that he came down to America as the second coming seems obviously a lunatic view of your poor brain. No one every saw Christ in America and since he appeared there so you are counting it as second coming? Seriously Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Did your brain works that way?

You must understand Jose Rodelio Retome Rata that Christ did not just appeared once soon after his resurrection. He appeared multiple times and in different occasions. So was it all about his second coming? Of course not. But I guess you don't know that it happens in the Bible Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. I think that you just only read some lines and keep it as the perfect doctrine of your bigoted study of INC religion. That's not gonna work, Jose. Here's some of the list below, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata so you'll get to know your Bible -

• John 20:14-18 - To Mary Magdalene.
• Luke 24:13-35 - To two disciples on the road to Emmaus.
• John 20:19-29 - To the apostles (twice, including Thomas).
• 1 Corinthians 15:5-8 - Appears to 500 at once.
• Acts 7:55-56 - Stephen sees Jesus standing at God’s right hand (But let's consider this as Hallucination since your understanding about visions and revelation were just merely a dream)
• Acts 9:3-6 - Appears to Paul on the road to Damascus (But let's consider this as Hallucination since your understanding about visions and revelation were just merely a dream)
• Acts 22:17-21 - Appears again in the temple.
• Revelation 1:12-18 - Appears to John (But let's consider this as Hallucination since your understanding about visions and revelation were just merely a dream)
• Revelation 5 - Appears in heaven as the Lamb (But let's consider this as Hallucination since your understanding about visions and revelation were just merely a dream)

3 Nephi 11:8,12,21

8 And it came to pass, as they understood they cast their eyes up again towards heaven; and behold, they saw a Man descending out of heaven; and he was clothed in a white robe; and he came down and stood in the midst of them; and the eyes of the whole multitude were turned upon him, and they durst not open their mouths, even one to another, and wist not what it meant, for they thought it was an angel that had appeared unto them.

12 And it came to pass that when Jesus had spoken these words the whole multitude fell to the earth; for they remembered that it had been prophesied among them that Christ should show himself unto them after his ascension into heaven.

21 And the Lord said unto him: I give unto you power that ye shall baptize this people when I am again ascended into heaven.

This LDS church go against the teaching of the Bible.

No wonder why because their prophet was a false prophet trying to pervert the gospel of Christ.

Just when did this verse that you choose to pick up go against the teachings of the Bible. Go ahead and quote it, and let's discuss this one by one and let's go ahead and debate this as against Biblical records. Do you have any particular issue about this verses? It seems like you just want to keep doing that program the you promote such as copy paste program of Cherry-picking of your INC studio. Come on, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata! Go ahead and make a statement and lets get in to it if you may. You can ask one of your INC cohorts to act as moderator if you need it.

1 John 4:1 King James Version

4 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

Everyone can clearly see that Jose Rodelio Retome Rata; everyone knows what the verses was for. So do you apply that to your Philippine Prophet of the Far-East movement of Iglesia Ni Cristo? Did you understand how your Felix Manalo's self-proclaim as the prophet to restore the Philippine Religion? Do you know how many witnesses that can prove his claim as the prophet or Sugo of your Far East movement? Go ahead and educate us, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata.

Galatians 1:6-9 King James Version

6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:

7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.

8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.

9 As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

Again, this content was use over and over, so the question to you, Jose Rodelio Retome Rara; Do you know and understand the context? This has been explained to you over and over and yet you don't have any rebuttal on this subject. Still coward Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Now to repeat my statement about this, you should look at your scripture that this has nothing to do with your so called another Gosple such as the Book of Mormon rather it has something to do with the Judaizers who tries to convert the Gentile like the Galatians saints to the Laws that they still observe in which Paul clearly states that it is no longer necessary, and yet some of them even the apostles still observe and follow the traditions which lead them to debate the matter as found in the Acts 15. And here you are still using the same old style of cherry-picking without knowing the context. Nice try, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, you still fail.

Check out this topic at -

• https://bustillo-family.blogspot.com/2025/12/nagpakita-issue-by-jose-rodelio-retome.html
• https://bustillo-family.blogspot.com/2026/01/itinuturo-ng-mga-mormon-lds-na-naparito.html
• https://bustillo-family.blogspot.com/2025/11/unang-pagkabuhay-ng-mga-patay-by-rebuker.html

Screenshot that he still posted in his wall
thinking this has something to do with Christ visit to America

BOOK OF MORMON VS BOOK OF MORMON!? - Sure ka Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

Here we are in one of the Fun Fact that Jose Rodelio Retome Rata*** and thinking this has something to do about contradictions and of course, was it found in the Book of Mormon?

BOOK OF MORMON VS BOOK OF MORMON!

Abraham 4:3-5

3 And they (the Gods) said: Let there be light; and there was light.

4 And they (the Gods) comprehended the light, for it was bright; and they divided the light, or caused it to be divided, from the darkness.

5 And the Gods called the light Day, and the darkness they called Night. And it came to pass that from the evening until morning they called night; and from the morning until the evening they called day; and this was the first, or the beginning, of that which they called day and night.

VS

Moses 1:6

6 And I have a work for thee, Moses, my son; and thou art in the similitude of mine Only Begotten; and mine Only Begotten is and shall be the Savior, for he is full of grace and truth; but there is no God beside me, and all things are present with me, for I know them all.

Moses 2:3-5

3 And I, God, said: Let there be light; and there was light.

4 And I, God, saw the light; and that light was good. And I, God, divided the light from the darkness.

5 And I, God, called the light Day; and the darkness, I called Night; and this I did by the word of my power, and it was done as I spake; and the evening and the morning were the first day.

First of all, the Book of Mormon did not start with the seven (7) days creation that this Jose Rodelio Retome Rata*** wasn't aware about. This were not written in the Book of Mormon but rather in the Pearl of Great Price. This alone proves that he is brainless and only cherry-picks some stuff that he never study or understood the context.

To understand this misunderstood statement of Jose Rodelio Retome Rata***, let's go back to the basic Biblical Phrase at the very beginning of the Book that says this -

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. - Genesis 1:1

What's the actual Hebrew words that was written on it, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? To help you out on the answer to that question in which you don't know about, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, let's post it here -

בְּרֵאשִׁ֖ית בָּרָ֣א אֱלֹהִ֑ים אֵ֥ת הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם וְאֵ֥ת הָאָֽרֶץ׃

The word אֱלֹהִ֑ים (Elohim) was addressed as plural or in a plural form. Though most trinitarian suggest that this has something to do with the trinity, The Latter-day Saints view is different. And take note, the word הַשָּׁמַ֖יִם (heavens) was also in plural form. So what was this all about in LDS Theology? The use of the plural form is not related to the doctrine of the Trinity, cause LDS doesn't believe that; this Plurality simply understood as the council of God as stated in Psalm 82. The Monotheistic view states that this council were simple called judges, which is a direct contradiction of Christ statement (on John 10:34-36) addressing the Jews about his existence with the Father, and eventually one of the very reasons that leads to his crucifixion. So, the question would be; was Joseph Smith right in directly using the plural word of the translation of the Book of Abraham? He does, in a sense that they were compose of Councils of heavenly beings. So, obviously, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, is clueless of his criticism about the usage of the word.

Check out this post from Daniel McClellan on this topic - אלהים Does Not Mean “Judges” and Robert Boylan's Refuting Matthew Paulson on the use of "God of gods": Origen's Commentary on John

Jerry Nuñez Bustillo-Isn't it FUN FACT?

Yes it is, the Fun Fact here that you are Clueless and your study is merely just scratching the surface. Try to dig dipper Jose Rodelio Retome Rata to know more about your Bible. Thank you for taking it up

A false witness is punishable by God - by Jose Rodelio Retome Rata

And here we are again in one of Jose Rodelio Retome Rata's False Assumption and circular Reasoning. So let's dive in to see his claim -

A false witness is punishable by God.

Okay so which witness you are referring to, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? 

Proverbs 19:5 King James Version

5 A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape.

The punishment is the second death which is the lake of fire.

Revelation 21:8 King James Version

8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

This is just a quote that you think might be the best stone to catch the bird Jose Rodelio Retome Rata. Question is can you prove it? And it the same stone will thrown to you, can you provide evidence of you claim witnesses on your Religion, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

The testimony of the LDS church the Bible and the book of Mormon are two witnesses.

Ok so we already have it so what your point again?

Exodus 14:16,21 King James Version

16 But lift thou up thy rod, and stretch out thine hand over the sea, and divide it: and the children of Israel shall go on dry ground through the midst of the sea.

21 And Moses stretched out his hand over the sea; and the Lord caused the sea to go back by a strong east wind all that night, and made the sea dry land, and the waters were divided.

According to the Bible Moses lift up his rod and stretched out his hand over the sea and the waters were divided.

But according to the book of Mormon Moses spoke to the waters of the Red Sea and were divided.

1 Nephi 4:2

2 Therefore let us go up; let us be strong like unto Moses; for he truly spake unto the waters of the Red Sea and they divided hither and thither, and our fathers came through, out of captivity, on dry ground, and the armies of Pharaoh did follow and were drowned in the waters of the Red Sea.

Oh really, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata!? Just because the authors has different version of presenting the notion of the story, so you automatically conclude it is false? Is that So, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata? Did you understand the context of each presentation Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

We should understand the settings first before thinking something didn't happen just because of the limited account that has been recorded. Also, as I had said earlier, because of some limited text and phrases found in the bible, does it necessarily the only thing that happens that time, Jose Rodelio Retome Rate? Which I remember one time that you people try to excuse Felix authority to baptized, just because there is no record of John's Baptism? Really man!?

So why did Nephi say spake unto the waters? This is simply figurative or rhetorical language, which is common during their time in ancient Semitic-style speech. Nephi speech is not a direct quote, rather it's a motivational speech for his brethren and this doesn't directly applies at to what the exact scriptural quote did said about. You should remember Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, they don't have any record during that time and the only record was actually they are planning to obtain from someone who hold's it. So why would Nephi use a line by line quote while it isn't even the case of his address?

The book of Mormon contradicts the Bible.

The book of Mormon is a false witness.

So when did the Book of Mormon Contradict use a quote that doesn't even available during that time, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata?

From Jose Rodelio Retome Rata's Screenshot that I don't even know how he understood the context.