[ Quote ]

Plan of the Year 2023

Happy New Year Everyone. Have a blessed New Year to all and to those people who were near to my heart.

Anyway, I plan on merging all of the blogs that I created and make in just one blog. I got so much busy days so I think I could no longer manage some of it in my spare time. I actually separate it so it will be easy to navigate it's label.

So, that plan will be next year and hope to finish it early. Some will be linked redundantly, so it would take time to clean it one by one.

Me in Easylite Home Lightings Trading.
Working as a General Supervisor and Sales Associate.

Saraijah during their Christmas Program

This is just a collection of Saraijah Memory during thier Christmas Program.

Saraijah posed for picture taking. 
 
Distribution of Gifts.
Another picture
My Wife Asuncion received the sack of rice

Just another close-up picture. 

There's no such thing as?: Conversation with Ronnie Pacaro

Say "Thank you and Goodbye" to someone to let them know you're keeping up if you can't hold on to a good conversation. - Jerry N. Bustillo

Someone kept trolling a friend's post so I stopped by and asked a few questions if he has credibility for a discussion. But it turns out it is all but just childish talks.

My simple questions were simple as seen in the conversation below -



Conversation from Messenger

It all ended up laughing memes while taking the name Christian. Nice One.

There's no such thing as Apostasy?

Just about I made my comment in one of the OP critical to LDS, there was this guy try to open up something regarding Authority. So I directly message him about it and how he understood the subject. Unfortunately, it ended up senseless conversation.

Yeah right, that's how he wants to end the conversation.

Responding Ruru Valencia in his criticism of Joseph Smith as a Prophet of God. - Part 1

Alright another long post from an INC antagonist who tries to make something just out of their selected collection. And it seems has a long post to make a good comment on this one. I don't know if this will leads to a part two. Let's see what we can get -

PAGSUSURI SA ARAL NG MORMONS

JOSEPH SMITH TUNAY BANG SUGO NG DIYOS?

The question goes as if it tries to test something out of some documents about Joseph Smith Jr was a true prophet of God. I actually answered some of the same questions before and compare it to their called Sugo as how it had authority and how to know he was called of God. Fare question actually, but it would be better to make a comparison of the two. Let's see how it will end.


Sa panahon natin ngayon na laganap ang napakaraming relihiyon at napakaraming mangangaral na nagpapakilalang sila ang tunay at may karapatan sa pangangaral. Ang ating Panginoong Diyos ay hindi nagkulang ng pagbibigay sa atin ng gabay kung papaano makikilala ang tunay na mangangaral at ang tunay na relihiyon at ito’y sinalita ng Diyos at ipinasulat niya sa Biblia o mga Banal na Kasulatan.

Okay, so some introductions you want to open up to help the audience about this topic. It nice to know that, but unfortunately we don't believe in a close cannon. We believe that God will continue to reveal and guide his people. There are biblical evidence that proves us that revelations is continuous. For example, Paul's teaching to the Corinthians about the heaven's he saw that there's a man caught up in heaven that he never knew what it was and what language they're saying. Could this be a mystery only Paul did receive while non of the other apostle taught about it?

2 Corinthians 12

1 It is not expedient for me doubtless to glory. I WILL COME TO VISIONS AND REVELATIONS OF THE LORD.

2 I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) SUCH AN ONE CAUGHT UP TO THE THIRD HEAVEN.

3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I CANNOT TELL: GOD KNOWETH;)

4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.

Paul's Revelation is actually foreign in the teachings of prior apostle and wasn't even revealed by Christ. But he saw something out of Revelation that something needs to be unveiled by someone who has the same revelations and prophecy. So, who has it? I don't know, but perhaps this will verify our view and understand about the nature of God. He will never cease to guide and leads his people without someone to guide them. As in Amos 3:7 says God will do nothing, but he revealed his secrets unto his servants the prophets. Which simply means, he would not do any work unless someone will represent it for him. And that's where the prophets has its role.

Ano sinasabi ng Diyos sa mga BULAANG PROPETA o HINDI TUNAY NA SUGO ng Diyos?

Jeremias 23:21

HINDI KO SINUGO ANG MGA PROPETANG ITO, gayon ma'y nagsitakbo sila: AKO'Y HINDI NAGSALITA SA KANILA, GAYON MA'Y NANGHULA SILA.

Jeremias 14:14

Nang magkagayo'y sinabi ng Panginoon sa akin, ANG MGA PROPETA AY NANGHUHULA NG KASINUNGALINGAN SA AKING PANGALAN; HINDI KO SILA SINUGO, O INUTUSAN KO MAN SILA, O NAGSALITA MAN AKO SA KANILA: SILA'Y NANGANGHUHULA sa iyo ng sinungaling na pangitain, at ng panghuhula, at NG BAGAY NA WALA, at ng daya ng kanilang sariling puso.

Jeremias 23:26 Magandang Balita

KAILAN PA BA MAGBABAGO ANG MGA PROPETANG ITO NA NANGANGARAL NG KASINUNGALINGAN AT NAGPAPAHAYAG NG SARILI NILANG MGA KATHA?

First, thing's first. Let's try to see the contexts -

If you think this was all about the end of the prophets, better think again, Jeremiah is a prophet of that time, and during the Babelonian captivity, the people of the Lord adapted the teachings of Paganism. They were in bondage to Babelonian and some of them disregarded the teachings of the prophets, while some try to lead away people from the truth and proclaim to be a prophet of God. But actually God never calls them. See example in the chapters ahead to it, specifically in Jeremiah 28 shows an example of a false prophet Hananiah of that time who mislead people from the truth. Here's a word from Jeremiah to know about the true prophet of God -

Jeremiah 28:9 The prophet which prophesieth of peace, when the word of the prophet shall come to pass, then shall the prophet be known, that the Lord hath truly sent him.

Paano makikilala ang TUNAY NA SUGO ng Diyos?

Isaias 8:20

Sa KAUTUSAN at sa PATOTOO! kung hindi sila magsalita ng ayon sa salitang ito, tunay na walang umaga sa kanila.

This is epic, you are now trying to adapt you INC ideology of Sugo. But you never think of the question on how to know them. This is what Christ said -

Matthew 7:15 ¶ Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 

16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 

17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 

18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 

19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 

20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

Christ did never said there will be no more prophets or prophets days are over. But rather a warning to beware of false prophets and to know the true prophet, it is by their fruit. Did he says something about last messenger? I don't think so, but let try your idea about it.

Ibinigay ng Diyos ang pagkakakilanlan sa TUNAY NA SUGO. Dalawa ang katangiang kailangan nilang taglayin ayon sa Diyos: sila’y nagsasalita ayon sa;

(1) KAUTUSAN

(2) PATOTOO

Ang sabi nga “KUNG HINDI SILA MAGSALITA NG AYON SA SALITANG ITO TUNAY NA WALANG UMAGA SA KANILA”. Ang UMAGA ay kasingkahulugan ng LIWANAG:

Isaias 58:8

“Kung magkagayo'y SISIKAT ANG IYONG LIWANAG NA PARANG UMAGA, at ang iyong kagalingan ay biglang lilitaw; at ang iyong katuwiran ay mangunguna sa iyo; ang kaluwalhatian ng Panginoon ay magiging iyong bantay likod.”

Ibig sabihin kung hindi taglay ng isang mangangaral ang dalawang katangiang binanggit ng Diyos, ang nasa kanila ay hindi liwanag kundi kadiliman – ang mga mangangaral na ito ay hindi mga tunay na sugo ng Diyos kundi MGA BULAANG PROPETA o MGA BULAANG GURO.

I couldn't think of anything that would relate your post about knowing a prophet by just simply elaborating "Kautusan and Patotoo", not even close. Anyway, for the sake of commenting your post. God already provided you a scripture and as you claim on the first place "hindi nagkukulang and Dios sa pagbigay ng gabay" so why are we stock on it while the scripture as Christ said the only way to know the prophet AND/OR Sugo was through their fruit. And for the record there's nothing new Laws or even Commandments that has been given by your true messenger rather all of it were already written. You just can't simply claim you're a true sugo by just claiming some writings not even yours or should we say were not directed by God through your Sugo. And for the second part "Patotoo". What kind of Testimony was all about? The scripture has said in the mouth of two or three witnesses, every word will be stablished. So far, none could prove Felix Manalo's divine calling while Joseph Smith has 2 separate event to testify about his calling. The Three witnesses and Eight witnesses. (To know more bout it, click on the link I provided). And for the record, during some hard times, most of the witness left the church and some did never came back, but they never deny the testimony they knew and heard and saw that Joseph Smith, the unlearned man is indeed the prophet of God.

I'll leave a youtube link from Saints Unscripted to help you with some presentations. See prior videos to know more about it - https://youtu.be/r4Omuo2S6S0


... To be Continued ...

Responding Ruru Valencia in his criticism of Joseph Smith as a Prophet of God. - Part 1

Alright another long post from an INC antagonist who tries to make something just out of their selected collection. And it seems has a long post to make a good comment on this one. I don't know if this will leads to a part two. Let's see what we can get -

PAGSUSURI SA ARAL NG MORMONS

JOSEPH SMITH TUNAY BANG SUGO NG DIYOS?

The question goes as if it tries to test something out of some documents about Joseph Smith Jr was a true prophet of God. I actually answered some of the same questions before and compare it to their called Sugo as how it had authority and how to know he was called of God. Fare question actually, but it would be better to make a comparison of the two. Let's see how it will end.


Sa panahon natin ngayon na laganap ang napakaraming relihiyon at napakaraming mangangaral na nagpapakilalang sila ang tunay at may karapatan sa pangangaral. Ang ating Panginoong Diyos ay hindi nagkulang ng pagbibigay sa atin ng gabay kung papaano makikilala ang tunay na mangangaral at ang tunay na relihiyon at ito’y sinalita ng Diyos at ipinasulat niya sa Biblia o mga Banal na Kasulatan.

Okay, so some introductions you want to open up to help the audience about this topic. It nice to know that, but unfortunately we don't believe in a close cannon. We believe that God will continue to reveal and guide his people. There are biblical evidence that proves us that revelations is continuous. For example, Paul's teaching to the Corinthians about the heaven's he saw that there's a man caught up in heaven that he never knew what it was and what language they're saying. Could this be a mystery only Paul did receive while non of the other apostle taught about it?

2 Corinthians 12

1 It is not expedient for me doubtless to glory. I WILL COME TO VISIONS AND REVELATIONS OF THE LORD.

2 I knew a man in Christ above fourteen years ago, (whether in the body, I cannot tell; or whether out of the body, I cannot tell: God knoweth;) SUCH AN ONE CAUGHT UP TO THE THIRD HEAVEN.

3 And I knew such a man, (whether in the body, or out of the body, I CANNOT TELL: GOD KNOWETH;)

4 How that he was caught up into paradise, and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to utter.

Paul's Revelation is actually foreign in the teachings of prior apostle and wasn't even revealed by Christ. But he saw something out of Revelation that something needs to be unveiled by someone who has the same revelations and prophecy. So, who has it? I don't know, but perhaps this will verify our view and understand about the nature of God. He will never cease to guide and leads his people without someone to guide them. As in Amos 3:7 says God will do nothing, but he revealed his secrets unto his servants the prophets. Which simply means, he would not do any work unless someone will represent it for him. And that's where the prophets has its role.

Ano sinasabi ng Diyos sa mga BULAANG PROPETA o HINDI TUNAY NA SUGO ng Diyos?

Jeremias 23:21

HINDI KO SINUGO ANG MGA PROPETANG ITO, gayon ma'y nagsitakbo sila: AKO'Y HINDI NAGSALITA SA KANILA, GAYON MA'Y NANGHULA SILA.

Jeremias 14:14

Nang magkagayo'y sinabi ng Panginoon sa akin, ANG MGA PROPETA AY NANGHUHULA NG KASINUNGALINGAN SA AKING PANGALAN; HINDI KO SILA SINUGO, O INUTUSAN KO MAN SILA, O NAGSALITA MAN AKO SA KANILA: SILA'Y NANGANGHUHULA sa iyo ng sinungaling na pangitain, at ng panghuhula, at NG BAGAY NA WALA, at ng daya ng kanilang sariling puso.

Jeremias 23:26 Magandang Balita

KAILAN PA BA MAGBABAGO ANG MGA PROPETANG ITO NA NANGANGARAL NG KASINUNGALINGAN AT NAGPAPAHAYAG NG SARILI NILANG MGA KATHA?

First, thing's first. Let's try to see the contexts -

If you think this was all about the end of the prophets, better think again, Jeremiah is a prophet of that time, and during the Babelonian captivity, the people of the Lord adapted the teachings of Paganism. They were in bondage to Babelonian and some of them disregarded the teachings of the prophets, while some try to lead away people from the truth and proclaim to be a prophet of God. But actually God never calls them. See example in the chapters ahead to it, specifically in Jeremiah 28 shows an example of a false prophet Hananiah of that time who mislead people from the truth. Here's a word from Jeremiah to know about the true prophet of God -

Jeremiah 28:9 The prophet which prophesieth of peace, when the word of the prophet shall come to pass, then shall the prophet be known, that the Lord hath truly sent him.

Paano makikilala ang TUNAY NA SUGO ng Diyos?

Isaias 8:20

Sa KAUTUSAN at sa PATOTOO! kung hindi sila magsalita ng ayon sa salitang ito, tunay na walang umaga sa kanila.

This is epic, you are now trying to adapt you INC ideology of Sugo. But you never think of the question on how to know them. This is what Christ said -

Matthew 7:15 ¶ Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 

16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 

17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 

18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 

19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 

20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.

Christ did never said there will be no more prophets or prophets days are over. But rather a warning to beware of false prophets and to know the true prophet, it is by their fruit. Did he says something about last messenger? I don't think so, but let try your idea about it.

Ibinigay ng Diyos ang pagkakakilanlan sa TUNAY NA SUGO. Dalawa ang katangiang kailangan nilang taglayin ayon sa Diyos: sila’y nagsasalita ayon sa;

(1) KAUTUSAN

(2) PATOTOO

Ang sabi nga “KUNG HINDI SILA MAGSALITA NG AYON SA SALITANG ITO TUNAY NA WALANG UMAGA SA KANILA”. Ang UMAGA ay kasingkahulugan ng LIWANAG:

Isaias 58:8

“Kung magkagayo'y SISIKAT ANG IYONG LIWANAG NA PARANG UMAGA, at ang iyong kagalingan ay biglang lilitaw; at ang iyong katuwiran ay mangunguna sa iyo; ang kaluwalhatian ng Panginoon ay magiging iyong bantay likod.”

Ibig sabihin kung hindi taglay ng isang mangangaral ang dalawang katangiang binanggit ng Diyos, ang nasa kanila ay hindi liwanag kundi kadiliman – ang mga mangangaral na ito ay hindi mga tunay na sugo ng Diyos kundi MGA BULAANG PROPETA o MGA BULAANG GURO.

I couldn't think of anything that would relate your post about knowing a prophet by just simply elaborating "Kautusan and Patotoo", not even close. Anyway, for the sake of commenting your post. God already provided you a scripture and as you claim on the first place "hindi nagkukulang and Dios sa pagbigay ng gabay" so why are we stock on it while the scripture as Christ said the only way to know the prophet AND/OR Sugo was through their fruit. And for the record there's nothing new Laws or even Commandments that has been given by your true messenger rather all of it were already written. You just can't simply claim you're a true sugo by just claiming some writings not even yours or should we say were not directed by God through your Sugo. And for the second part "Patotoo". What kind of Testimony was all about? The scripture has said in the mouth of two or three witnesses, every word will be stablished. So far, none could prove Felix Manalo's divine calling while Joseph Smith has 2 separate event to testify about his calling. The Three witnesses and Eight witnesses. (To know more bout it, click on the link I provided). And for the record, during some hard times, most of the witness left the church and some did never came back, but they never deny the testimony they knew and heard and saw that Joseph Smith, the unlearned man is indeed the prophet of God.

I'll leave a youtube link from Saints Unscripted to help you with some presentations. See prior videos to know more about it - https://youtu.be/r4Omuo2S6S0


... To be Continued ...

Pajama Reading

Pictures of Jasher and Saraijah during their Pajama Reading, a School program of Paulo Abastillas Senior Memorial Elementary School (PASMES).

They enjoyed their school and made some friends, but unfortunately, they left it without finishing the entire school year 2022-2023. We decide to move out and stay in Santo Rosario, it's away from their school. The decision was final were Jasher and Saraijah left and started their new environment at Sto Rosario Elementary School. It's kinda tough for Saraijah where she has to go through a lot of transition with her schoolmates, teacher, and her new home. there are a lot of stories actually but it's a kinda long story to tell. Anyway here are their old photos.




































Classic Contextual Misunderstanding of Job Bautista: Countenance of Nephi and Lehi

In this article, we can prove how slow and unlearned this INC Defender of Manalo is. He tries to crush the Book of Mormon by just simply quoting something out of his misunderstood statement and then declaring it as demonic. Was it Job Bautista?

Pagbubunyag sa aral ng demonyo na tinataguyod ng Lds Church : ito ang nakasulat ;

Wow! An Opening Remarks. Good to hear that. Let's see what we got there -

Helaman 5:36 At ito ay nangyari na, na siya ay lumingon, at masdan, nakita niya sa gitna ng ulap ng kadiliman ang mga mukha nina Nephi at Lehi; at masdan, labis silang kumikinang, maging tulad ng mga mukha ng anghel. At namasdan niyang nakatingin ang kanilang mga mata sa langit; at sila ay nasa ayos na sa wari’y nakikipag-usap o itinataas ang kanilang mga tinig sa kung sinong nilikha na namamasdan nila.

So, what's the Story all about before you pick up some of your favourite Cherries, Job Bautista's? For sure he doesn't know anything he quoted.

Here's the thesis Job Bautista, just to help you know the context -

Helaman 5
  • Verse 20-22 Nephi and Lehi preach in the Land of Nephi, but was rejected and in prison for many days without food...
  • Verses 23-28 They were encircled with fire and seen by the Lamanites and were overshadowed by clouds of Darkness.
Simply means they were surrounded by vapours of Dark not necessarily Clouds in a sky. To know about this story see the rest of the Chapter below the notes.

Ang mukha daw ni Nephi at Lehi nakita raw sa gitna ng ulap ng kadiliman ay kanilang nakita ?

And what is exactly you're up to? I'm thinking if you really understand the context or maybe some other Cherry-picking ideology of yours this time.

Isang panawagan : Ang mga nadaya ni Joseph smith, lumayas na kayo dyan at baka kayo dalhin ng Matandang dragon sa impierno. Rev. 12:9 na dumaya sa inyo . Kailan pa kayo aalis kung wala ng panahon pa ? Rev. 21:8

I don't know if you're doing this on purpose, or just want to get much attention. But unfortunately, you missed the whole point. Better luck next time.

Notes:

The Rest of the Verse -

THE BOOK OF HELAMAN CH. 5

And it came to pass that in this same year, behold, Nephi delivered up the judgment-seat to a man whose name was Cezoram.

2 For as their laws and their governments were established by the voice of the people, and they who chose evil were more numerous than they who chose good, therefore they were ripening for destruction, for the laws had become corrupted.

3 Yea, and this was not all; they were a stiffnecked people, insomuch that they could not be governed by the law nor justice, save it were to their destruction.

4 And it came to pass that Nephi had become weary because of their iniquity; and he yielded up the judgment-seat, and took it upon him to preach the word of God all the remainder of his days, and his brother Lehi also, all the remainder of his days;

5 For they remembered the words which their father Helaman spake unto them. And these are the words which he spake:

6 Behold, my sons, I desire that ye should remember to keep the commandments of God; and I would that ye should declare unto the people these words. Behold, I have given unto you the names of our first parents who came out of the land of Jerusalem; and this I have done that when you remember your names ye may remember them; and when ye remember them ye may remember their works; and when ye remember their works ye may know how that it is said, and also written, that they were good.

7 Therefore, my sons, I would that ye should do that which is good, that it may be said of you, and also written, even as it has been said and written of them.

8 And now my sons, behold I have somewhat more to desire of you, which desire is, that ye may not do these things that ye may boast, but that ye may do these things to lay up for yourselves a treasure in heaven, yea, which is eternal, and which fadeth not away; yea, that ye may have that precious gift of eternal life, which we have reason to suppose hath been given to our fathers.

9 O remember, remember, my sons, the words which king Benjamin spake unto his people; yea, remember that there is no other way nor means whereby man can be saved, only through the atoning blood of Jesus Christ, who shall come; yea, remember that he cometh to redeem the world.

10 And remember also the words which Amulek spake unto Zeezrom, in the city of Ammonihah; for he said unto him that the Lord surely should come to redeem his people, but that he should not come to redeem them in their sins, but to redeem them from their sins.

11 And he hath power given unto him from the Father to redeem them from their sins because of repentance; therefore he hath sent his angels to declare the tidings of the conditions of repentance, which bringeth unto the power of the Redeemer, unto the salvation of their souls.

12 And now, my sons, remember, remember that it is upon the rock of our Redeemer, who is Christ, the Son of God, that ye must build your foundation; that when the devil shall send forth his mighty winds, yea, his shafts in the whirlwind, yea, when all his hail and his mighty storm shall beat upon you, it shall have no power over you to drag you down to the gulf of misery and endless wo, because of the rock upon which ye are built, which is a sure foundation, a foundation whereon if men build they cannot fall.

13 And it came to pass that these were the words which Helaman taught to his sons; yea, he did teach them many things which are not written, and also many things which are written.

14 And they did remember his words; and therefore they went forth, keeping the commandments of God, to teach the word of God among all the people of Nephi, beginning at the city Bountiful;

15 And from thenceforth to the city of Gid; and from the city of Gid to the city of Mulek;

16 And even from one city to another, until they had gone forth among all the people of Nephi who were in the land southward; and from thence into the land of Zarahemla, among the Lamanites.

17 And it came to pass that they did preach with great power, insomuch that they did confound many of those dissenters who had gone over from the Nephites, insomuch that they came forth and did confess their sins and were baptized unto repentance, and immediately returned to the Nephites to endeavor to repair unto them the wrongs which they had done.

18 And it came to pass that Nephi and Lehi did preach unto the Lamanites with such great power and authority, for they had power and authority given unto them that they might speak, and they also had what they should speak given unto them—

19 Therefore they did speak unto the great astonishment of the Lamanites, to the convincing them, insomuch that there were eight thousand of the Lamanites who were in the land of Zarahemla and round about baptized unto repentance, and were convinced of the wickedness of the traditions of their fathers.

20 And it came to pass that Nephi and Lehi did proceed from thence to go to the land of Nephi.

21 And it came to pass that they were taken by an army of the Lamanites and cast into prison; yea, even in that same prison in which Ammon and his brethren were cast by the servants of Limhi.

22 And after they had been cast into prison many days without food, behold, they went forth into the prison to take them that they might slay them.

23 And it came to pass that Nephi and Lehi were encircled about as if by fire, even insomuch that they durst not lay their hands upon them for fear lest they should be burned. Nevertheless, Nephi and Lehi were not burned; and they were as standing in the midst of fire and were not burned.

24 And when they saw that they were encircled about with a pillar of fire, and that it burned them not, their hearts did take courage.

25 For they saw that the Lamanites durst not lay their hands upon them; neither durst they come near unto them, but stood as if they were struck dumb with amazement.

26 And it came to pass that Nephi and Lehi did stand forth and began to speak unto them, saying: Fear not, for behold, it is God that has shown unto you this marvelous thing, in the which is shown unto you that ye cannot lay your hands on us to slay us.

27 And behold, when they had said these words, the earth shook exceedingly, and the walls of the prison did shake as if they were about to tumble to the earth; but behold, they did not fall. And behold, they that were in the prison were Lamanites and Nephites who were dissenters.

28 And it came to pass that they were overshadowed with a cloud of darkness, and an awful solemn fear came upon them.

29 And it came to pass that there came a voice as if it were above the cloud of darkness, saying: Repent ye, repent ye, and seek no more to destroy my servants whom I have sent unto you to declare good tidings.

30 And it came to pass when they heard this voice, and beheld that it was not a voice of thunder, neither was it a voice of a great tumultuous noise, but behold, it was a still voice of perfect mildness, as if it had been a whisper, and it did pierce even to the very soul—

31 And notwithstanding the mildness of the voice, behold the earth shook exceedingly, and the walls of the prison trembled again, as if it were about to tumble to the earth; and behold the cloud of darkness, which had overshadowed them, did not disperse—

32 And behold the voice came again, saying: Repent ye, repent ye, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand; and seek no more to destroy my servants. And it came to pass that the earth shook again, and the walls trembled.

33 And also again the third time the voice came, and did speak unto them marvelous words which cannot be uttered by man; and the walls did tremble again, and the earth shook as if it were about to divide asunder.

34 And it came to pass that the Lamanites could not flee because of the cloud of darkness which did overshadow them; yea, and also they were immovable because of the fear which did come upon them.

35 Now there was one among them who was a Nephite by birth, who had once belonged to the church of God but had dissented from them.

36 And it came to pass that he turned him about, and behold, he saw through the cloud of darkness the faces of Nephi and Lehi; and behold, they did shine exceedingly, even as the faces of angels. And he beheld that they did lift their eyes to heaven; and they were in the attitude as if talking or lifting their voices to some being whom they beheld.

37 And it came to pass that this man did cry unto the multitude, that they might turn and look. And behold, there was power given unto them that they did turn and look; and they did behold the faces of Nephi and Lehi.

38 And they said unto the man: Behold, what do all these things mean, and who is it with whom these men do converse?

39 Now the man’s name was Aminadab. And Aminadab said unto them: They do converse with the angels of God.

40 And it came to pass that the Lamanites said unto him: What shall we do, that this cloud of darkness may be removed from overshadowing us?

41 And Aminadab said unto them: You must repent, and cry unto the voice, even until ye shall have faith in Christ, who was taught unto you by Alma, and Amulek, and Zeezrom; and when ye shall do this, the cloud of darkness shall be removed from overshadowing you.

42 And it came to pass that they all did begin to cry unto the voice of him who had shaken the earth; yea, they did cry even until the cloud of darkness was dispersed.

43 And it came to pass that when they cast their eyes about, and saw that the cloud of darkness was dispersed from overshadowing them, behold, they saw that they were encircled about, yea every soul, by a pillar of fire.

44 And Nephi and Lehi were in the midst of them; yea, they were encircled about; yea, they were as if in the midst of a flaming fire, yet it did harm them not, neither did it take hold upon the walls of the prison; and they were filled with that joy which is unspeakable and full of glory.

45 And behold, the Holy Spirit of God did come down from heaven, and did enter into their hearts, and they were filled as if with fire, and they could speak forth marvelous words.

46 And it came to pass that there came a voice unto them, yea, a pleasant voice, as if it were a whisper, saying:

47 Peace, peace be unto you, because of your faith in my Well Beloved, who was from the foundation of the world.

48 And now, when they heard this they cast up their eyes as if to behold from whence the voice came; and behold, they saw the heavens open; and angels came down out of heaven and ministered unto them.

49 And there were about three hundred souls who saw and heard these things; and they were bidden to go forth and marvel not, neither should they doubt.

50 And it came to pass that they did go forth, and did minister unto the people, declaring throughout all the regions round about all the things which they had heard and seen, insomuch that the more part of the Lamanites were convinced of them, because of the greatness of the evidences which they had received.

51 And as many as were convinced did lay down their weapons of war, and also their hatred and the tradition of their fathers.

52 And it came to pass that they did yield up unto the Nephites the lands of their possession.


Responding to Job Bautista: Copycat Story of LDS Church

Seem Job Bautista ignorantly misunderstood what the Book of Mormon quote about Isaiah's words. And here he make a commentary about it thinking it is fallacy or plagiarism of Isaiah's words or the bible itself. Never thinking how it was quoted. Lets try to see how he simply misunderstood the book of Mormon by just thinking it as a copy of Isaiah's words. -

Copy cat story of Lds church:

Mababasa natin sa aklat nila na ang Dios daw nagtanong kay Nephi kung sino ang kanyang isusugo ? Ganito ang kuwento sa huwad na aklat ;

2 Nephi 16:9 At sinabi niya: Humayo at sabihin sa mga taong ito—Inyo ngang naririnig, subalit hindi ninyo nauunawaan; at inyo ngang nakikita, subalit hindi ninyo namamalas.
10 Patigasin mo ang mga puso ng mga taong ito, at takpan mo ang kanilang mga tainga, at ipinid ang kanilang mga mata—na baka makita ng kanilang mga mata, at marinig ng kanilang mga tainga, at makaunawa sa kanilang mga puso, at magbalik-loob at magsigaling.

Okay, so you think it is wrong to quote a scripture or a word of a prophet? Below is the example of a quote from Old Testament -

18 The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,

19 To preach the acceptable year of the Lord.

Luke 4:18-19

So, tell me where do you think this scripture from? Christ read this words from Isaiah 61:1-2, then what are you gonna do about that? Did the writer plagiarized Isaiah's words just because Christ quoted it?

There are other reference of quoting the words from other books in the bible and I will add some of it here after my Commentary.

Natitiyak natin na ang pangyayari na ito ay kinopya ni Joseph Smith sa katauhan ni Nephi , ang aklat ni Isaias na ganito ang ating mababasa;

Isaiwas 6:8 At narinig ko ang tinig ni Yahweh na nagsasabi, “Sino ang aking ipadadala? Sino ang magpapahayag para sa atin?” Sumagot ako, “Narito po ako; ako ang inyong isugo!”WR,

Isaias 6:9 At sinabi niya, “Humayo ka at sabihin mo sa mga tao: ‘Makinig man kayo nang makinig ay hindi kayo makakaunawa; tumingin man kayo nang tumingin ay hindi kayo makakakita.’

Isaias 6:10 Papurulin mo ang kanilang kaisipan, kanilang pandinig iyo ring takpan, bulagin mo sila upang hindi makakita, upang sila'y hindi makarinig, hindi makakita, at hindi makaunawa. Kundi'y baka magbalik-loob sila at sila'y pagalingin ko pa.”

To know why was the words of Isaiah were quoted in that Chapter and beyond that, and some other Chapters even on the First Book of Nephi were he explains more of the words of Isaiah to his Eldest Brothers, Laman and Lemuel (Im thinking on making a blog post about this topic.). See this part here before reading that 2 Nephi 12, Job Bautista. So you'll know why was it -

2 Nephi 11:8 And now I write some of the words of Isaiah, that whoso of my people shall see these words may lift up their hearts and rejoice for all men. Now these are the words, and ye may liken them unto you and unto all men.

And for sure, you never think of it. The reason why sometime you miss quote the scripture be because of too much cherry pick verses. 

Samakatuwid, walang originality itong kuwento ang aklat ng mga Mormon isang copy cat na naman ang ating napapatunayan sa pagkakataon na ito.

Or more accurately, you dont know how to comprehend a text. Simple as it is. Which mean you need more time to Study more about the scriptural context rather the textual criticism. What a failure?

Nature of Christ: Responding Emmanuel Dela Cruz

Some random Challenge of an INC member seems to call my attention. It's not a post but a formal Written Debate between LDS and INC and in this side comments he made a challenge on some Scripture that was used against them that they always twist for no good reason. Here is the text and let's try responding to some of it. 

Calling the attention of all members of Jesus christ latter day saint

Yung mga mahihilig gumamit ng mga maling salin sa Hebrew 1:8 at filipos 2:6-8 usap tayo. TINDIGAN NYO MGA MALING PAGKAKAUNAWA NYO.

So here, he opened up some scripture found in Hebrews 1:8 and Philippians 2:6-8. Let's try to see how it said first before we get through his comments -

Hebrews 1:8 (Nestle-Aland 28) πρὸς δὲ τὸν υἱόν·ὁ θρόνος σου ὁ θεὸς εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα τοῦ αἰῶνος, καὶ ἡ ῥάβδος τῆς εὐθύτητος ῥάβδος τῆς βασιλείας σου.

(Transliteration) pros de ton huion; ho thronos sou ho theos eis ton aiōna tou aiōnos, kai hē rhabdos tēs euthytētos rhabdos tēs basileias sou.

(Literal) Unto however the Son the throne of you O God [is] to the age of the age and the scepter of righteousness [is] the scepter of the kingdom of you.

(KJV Paraphrase) But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

And in Philippians 2:6-8 here's the text -

Philippians 2 (Nestle 1904)

6 ὃς ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα Θεῷ, 

7 ἀλλὰ ἑαυτὸν ἐκένωσεν μορφὴν δούλου λαβών, ἐν ὁμοιώματι ἀνθρώπων γενόμενος· καὶ σχήματι εὑρεθεὶς ὡς ἄνθρωπος 

8 ἐταπείνωσεν ἑαυτὸν γενόμενος ὑπήκοος μέχρι θανάτου, θανάτου δὲ σταυροῦ.

(Literal Emphasis Translation)

6 Who, already existing in the form of God, did not suppose (esteem, count) it something to be seized to be equal (greek-isos, latin-aequalem, identical, equivalent) with God,

7 but rather emptied Himself, having taken the form of a bond-slave, having emerged (become, been born) in the same likeness of men.

8 And having been found in outer appearance as a man, He humbled Himself, having become compliant even to death, even the death of the cross.

(Peshitta Holy Bible Translated)

6 He who, while he was in the form of God, did not esteem this as a prize, that he was the equal of God,

7 But he stripped himself and took the form of a Servant and was in the form of the children of men, and was found in fashion as a man.

8 And he humbled himself and was obedient unto death, even the death of being crucified.

Alright, so nothing suspicious, I just don't know why INC people keep twisting it. Well just see how he attempted to discredit Christ in this verse by just simply looking at some contradiction. Let's see how successful he was.

Alamin nga natin kung kailan sinalita ng Dios ng INC yung Hebrew 1:8: Based sa mga faborito nyong salin:

Simulan nga natin noong nasa langit pa ang kaganapan sa Hebrew 1:4-10 sabi ng Dios ayun sa Hebrew 1:4

Ang Anak ay ginawang higit na dakila kay sa mga anghel, tulad ng pangalan na ibinigay sa kanya ng Diyos ay higit na dakila.

Noong unang nahayag sa laman ayun sa 1temoteo 3:16.

He attempted to insert 1 Timothy 3:16 which says clearly about Christ and his Nature and how he successfully fulfilled his mission. But it seems he still has something on the table. Let's move forward to see how it goes -

ano na po bang nangyari? Ganun pa rin ba? kc nga based sa faborito nyong salin hinubad na daw pagkadios ayun sa filipos 2:6-8 . haha.

Seriously? How did you understand Philippians 2:6-8? Let's elaborate on it -

(Peshitta Holy Bible Translated)

6 He who, while he was in the form of God, did not esteem this as a prize, that he was the equal of God,

Christ was in the form of God, he was already there with the Father (as equal God) with the Glory he had before the world was created (John 17:5). But, did not take it in his Earthly Ministry rather (next verses) -

7 But he stripped himself and took the form of a Servant and was in the form of the children of men, and was found in fashion as a man.

He made himself low and took the tabernacle of man or as the seed of Abraham, and experience as a human had experience, to succor how every human suffering such as pain and death, so he can conquer it (Hebrew 2:16-18) -

8 And he humbled himself and was obedient unto death, even the death of being crucified.

And at the end of his atonement, Death is conquered and every soul is free. (1 Corinthians 15:52-58). That's the very reason why Christ took the seed of Abraham that all humans will be free from the bondage of sin and death. But the INC tries to pervert his Nature by simply trying to reason out some misunderstood biblical text.

Uulitin natin ayun sa Hebrew 1:4 ginawang higit na dakila kaysa mga anghel.

Ito na po: ano na nga ba ang nangyari noong unang nahayag na sa laman ang salita (Cristo):

Siya'y ginawa mong mababa ng kaunti kay sa mga anghel; Siya'y pinutungan mo ng kaluwalhatian at ng karangalan, At siya'y inilagay mo sa ibabaw ng mga gawa ng iyong mga kamay: - Heb. 2:7.

Ang linaw diba! Ang sabi ginawang mong mababa ng kaunti kaysa mga Anghel..hehe

Okay, did you read the rest of that chapter and know why Christ accepted the call? Or maybe select some parts as an excuse. So far as I know, messengers as your teaching goes are angels, and in that case, christ is lower than your messengers. Does it make sense? If you keep jumping on some verse without understanding the context obviously you'll be misguided. That's what it says on your commentary. 

Nakita mo na ba comparison? O nagbubulagbulagan ka lang.😅 Kung hindi pa. Uulitin ko!

Ang sabi sa Hebrew 1:4 higit na dakila kaysa sa mga Anghel. Ayun naman sa Hebrew 2:7 siya'y ginawa mong mababa ng kaunti kaysa mga anghel.case closed!

Say what? So, tell me, which part there do you accept? Hebrews 1:4 or Hebrews 2:7? As I have said, read the entire chapter to know the reason why Christ choose to live in Abraham's seed. There are reasons you people should know about his nature and yet you keep contradicting the scripture to satisfy your unitarian view. That won't work. 

haha kaya malinaw talaga na sinalita ng Dios yang Hebrew 1:8- hindi pa nahahayag ang taong si Cristo sa laman. Ito pa katunayan:

Okay, so it seems like you're trying to put the subject as an unfulfilled prophecy, while Paul is trying to explain how it was fulfilled. I don't know how you people understand the scriptures but I don't think that makes sense at all. If you can elaborate on it, then explain how this became an unfulfilled prophecy.

Balikan natin ang Hebrew 1:6 At nang isusugo na ng Diyos ang kanyang panganay na Anak sa sanlibutan ay sinabi niya...haha napakaliwanag pa sa sikat ng araw: future tense uulitin ko. ang sabi sa Hebrew 1:6 at nang isusugo or sa ibang salin, at ng dinadala (present tense). wala pang past tense jan..kaya malinaw na kahit sa faborito nyong salin pag sinuri sablay talaga aral nyo kahit sa mga faborito nyong talata.hehe😅😆😊

I don't think it necessary to dispute something that is already fulfilled. Simply you keep jumping off the topic to make it more meaningful in your INC doctrine. But perhaps we can learn together about the text you want to bring up. What exactly is it? -

Hebrew 1:6 And again, when he bringeth in the first-begotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.

Did you catch it? Let's try some other version to see what it said -

Strong's Concordance
palin: back (of place), again (of time), further Original Word: πάλιν
Part of Speech: Adverb
Transliteration: palin
Phonetic Spelling: (pal'-in)
Definition: back (of place), again (of time), further
Usage: again, back, once more, further, on the other hand.

 παλιν (adverb) palin "pal'-in": (adverbially) anew, i.e. (of place) back, (of time) once more, or (conjunctionally) furthermore or on the other hand -- again.

Let's try to see the actual Tagalog text -

Hebrew 1:6 At muli nang dinadala niya ang panganay sa sangkalupaan ay sinasabi, At sambahin siya ng lahat ng mga anghel ng Dios.

Again, Just want to emphasize my point. It doesn't matter when it was as long as the nature of Christ remains the same. But still, you need to analyze the text though.

Moving forward, here are the questions he wants to open up. I don't know if I could understand it clearly in the Tagalog version -

Now, ito tanong ko sa inyo.

1. Noong binuhay ng Dios ng INC si Cristo at umakyat sa langit. Dios ba sya ngayon dun sa langit? Anong talata.😊

Yeah, sure let's answer that and will. I'll give my reference answer and at the same time, I'll throw some questions to make it more even -

My answer is Yes, here are my opinion -
1. Can a mere(Human) man sit on God's throne? - Hebrews 1:8, 12:2
2. Did Stephen says they have a difference in glory between Christ and God? Whom did he call to receive his spirit? - Acts 7:55-59
3. If he is still a man, what kind of Glory does he has while sitting with God? Did God share his Glory? - Isaiah 42:8, 48:11
4. Will he still die? If not, then what kind of Human doesn't die? -Additional Question

2. Sa panahon ba natin ngayon, nahayag na bang muli si Cristo?anong talata?

This could be on a different topic, but it's a good question. But anyway, let's try that. Here's my opinion below -

If you're talking about his second coming, of course no. No man knoweth when will he comes again only the Father. Don't misunderstand that line. The father is superior to him, which means He is the one who holds the plan as to when will be the second coming. But if you're talking about the restoration, in which INC also has the same doctrine of restoration, then My answer is yes, and let's get basic scriptures about it -

God will not do anything without a prophet, and of course, in your doctrine, you call it a messenger. - Amos 3:7. The only difference was, Christ never manifest to Felix and restore His Church.

Waiting for ur answers. Thanks!✌

- Done

Nature of Christ: Responding Emmanuel Dela Cruz

Some random Challenge of an INC member seems to call my attention. It's not a post but a formal Written Debate between LDS and INC and in this side comments he made a challenge on some Scripture that was used against them that they always twist for no good reason. Here is the text and let's try responding to some of it. 

Calling the attention of all members of Jesus christ latter day saint
Yung mga mahihilig gumamit ng mga maling salin sa Hebrew 1:8 at filipos 2:6-8 usap tayo. TINDIGAN NYO MGA MALING PAGKAKAUNAWA NYO.

So here, he opened up some scripture found in Hebrews 1:8 and Philippians 2:6-8. Let's try to see how it said first before we get through his comments -

Hebrews 1:8 (Nestle-Aland 28) πρὸς δὲ τὸν υἱόν·ὁ θρόνος σου ὁ θεὸς εἰς τὸν αἰῶνα τοῦ αἰῶνος, καὶ ἡ ῥάβδος τῆς εὐθύτητος ῥάβδος τῆς βασιλείας σου.
(Transliteration) pros de ton huion; ho thronos sou ho theos eis ton aiōna tou aiōnos, kai hē rhabdos tēs euthytētos rhabdos tēs basileias sou.
(Literal) Unto however the Son the throne of you O God [is] to the age of the age and the scepter of righteousness [is] the scepter of the kingdom of you.
(KJV Paraphrase) But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.

And in Philippians 2:6-8 here's the text -

Philippians 2 (Nestle 1904)
6 ὃς ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα Θεῷ,
7 ἀλλὰ ἑαυτὸν ἐκένωσεν μορφὴν δούλου λαβών, ἐν ὁμοιώματι ἀνθρώπων γενόμενος· καὶ σχήματι εὑρεθεὶς ὡς ἄνθρωπος
8 ἐταπείνωσεν ἑαυτὸν γενόμενος ὑπήκοος μέχρι θανάτου, θανάτου δὲ σταυροῦ.

(Literal Emphasis Translation)
6 Who, already existing in the form of God, did not suppose (esteem, count) it something to be seized to be equal (greek-isos, latin-aequalem, identical, equivalent) with God,
7 but rather emptied Himself, having taken the form of a bond-slave, having emerged (become, been born) in the same likeness of men.
8 And having been found in outer appearance as a man, He humbled Himself, having become compliant even to death, even the death of the cross.

(Peshitta Holy Bible Translated)
6 He who, while he was in the form of God, did not esteem this as a prize, that he was the equal of God,
7 But he stripped himself and took the form of a Servant and was in the form of the children of men, and was found in fashion as a man.
8 And he humbled himself and was obedient unto death, even the death of being crucified.

Alright, so nothing suspicious, I just don't know why INC people keep twisting it. Well just see how he attempted to discredit Christ in this verse by just simply looking at some contradiction. Let's see how successful he was.

Alamin nga natin kung kailan sinalita ng Dios ng INC yung Hebrew 1:8: Based sa mga faborito nyong salin:
Simulan nga natin noong nasa langit pa ang kaganapan sa Hebrew 1:4-10 sabi ng Dios ayun sa Hebrew 1:4
Ang Anak ay ginawang higit na dakila kay sa mga anghel, tulad ng pangalan na ibinigay sa kanya ng Diyos ay higit na dakila.
Noong unang nahayag sa laman ayun sa 1temoteo 3:16.

He attempted to insert 1 Timothy 3:16 which says clearly about Christ and his Nature and how he successfully fulfilled his mission. But it seems he still has something on the table. Let's move forward to see how it goes -

ano na po bang nangyari? Ganun pa rin ba? kc nga based sa faborito nyong salin hinubad na daw pagkadios ayun sa filipos 2:6-8 . haha.

Seriously? How did you understand Philippians 2:6-8? Let's elaborate on it -

(Peshitta Holy Bible Translated)
6 He who, while he was in the form of God, did not esteem this as a prize, that he was the equal of God,

Christ was in the form of God, he was already there with the Father (as equal God) with the Glory he had before the world was created (John 17:5). But, did not take it in his Earthly Ministry rather (next verses) -

7 But he stripped himself and took the form of a Servant and was in the form of the children of men, and was found in fashion as a man.

He made himself low and took the tabernacle of man or as the seed of Abraham, and experience as a human had experience, to succor how every human suffering such as pain and death, so he can conquer it (Hebrew 2:16-18) -

8 And he humbled himself and was obedient unto death, even the death of being crucified.

And at the end of his atonement, Death is conquered and every soul is free. (1 Corinthians 15:52-58). That's the very reason why Christ took the seed of Abraham that all humans will be free from the bondage of sin and death. But the INC tries to pervert his Nature by simply trying to reason out some misunderstood biblical text.

Uulitin natin ayun sa Hebrew 1:4 ginawang higit na dakila kaysa mga anghel.
Ito na po: ano na nga ba ang nangyari noong unang nahayag na sa laman ang salita (Cristo):
Siya'y ginawa mong mababa ng kaunti kay sa mga anghel; Siya'y pinutungan mo ng kaluwalhatian at ng karangalan, At siya'y inilagay mo sa ibabaw ng mga gawa ng iyong mga kamay: - Heb. 2:7.
Ang linaw diba! Ang sabi ginawang mong mababa ng kaunti kaysa mga Anghel..hehe

Okay, did you read the rest of that chapter and know why Christ accepted the call? Or maybe select some parts as an excuse. So far as I know, messengers as your teaching goes are angels, and in that case, Christ is lower than your messengers. Does it make sense? If you keep jumping on some verse without understanding the context obviously you'll be misguided. That's what it says in your commentary. 

Nakita mo na ba comparison? O nagbubulagbulagan ka lang.😅 Kung hindi pa. Uulitin ko!
Ang sabi sa Hebrew 1:4 higit na dakila kaysa sa mga Anghel. Ayun naman sa Hebrew 2:7 siya'y ginawa mong mababa ng kaunti kaysa mga anghel.case closed!

Say what? So, tell me, which part there do you accept? Hebrews 1:4 or Hebrews 2:7? As I have said, read the entire chapter to know the reason why Christ chose to live in Abraham's seed. There are reasons you people should know about his nature and yet you keep contradicting the scripture to satisfy your unitarian view. That won't work. 

haha kaya malinaw talaga na sinalita ng Dios yang Hebrew 1:8- hindi pa nahahayag ang taong si Cristo sa laman. Ito pa katunayan:

Okay, so it seems like you're trying to put the subject as an unfulfilled prophecy, while Paul is trying to explain how it was fulfilled. I don't know how you people understand the scriptures but I don't think that makes sense at all. If you can elaborate on it, then explain how this became an unfulfilled prophecy.

Balikan natin ang Hebrew 1:6 At nang isusugo na ng Diyos ang kanyang panganay na Anak sa sanlibutan ay sinabi niya...haha napakaliwanag pa sa sikat ng araw: future tense uulitin ko. ang sabi sa Hebrew 1:6 at nang isusugo or sa ibang salin, at ng dinadala (present tense). wala pang past tense jan..kaya malinaw na kahit sa faborito nyong salin pag sinuri sablay talaga aral nyo kahit sa mga faborito nyong talata.hehe😅😆😊

I don't think it necessary to dispute something that is already fulfilled. Simply you keep jumping off the topic to make it more meaningful in your INC doctrine. But perhaps we can learn together about the text you want to bring up. What exactly is it? -

Hebrew 1:6 And again, when he bringeth in the first-begotten into the world, he saith, And let all the angels of God worship him.

Did you catch it? Let's try some other version to see what it said -

Strong's Concordance
palin: back (of place), again (of time), further Original Word: πάλιν
Part of Speech: Adverb
Transliteration: palin
Phonetic Spelling: (pal'-in)
Definition: back (of place), again (of time), further
Usage: again, back, once more, further, on the other hand.

 παλιν (adverb) palin "pal'-in": (adverbially) anew, i.e. (of place) back, (of time) once more, or (conjunctionally) furthermore or on the other hand -- again.

Let's try to see the actual Tagalog text -

Hebrew 1:6 At muli nang dinadala niya ang panganay sa sangkalupaan ay sinasabi, At sambahin siya ng lahat ng mga anghel ng Dios.

Again, Just want to emphasize my point. It doesn't matter when it was as long as the nature of Christ remains the same. But still, you need to analyze the text though.

Moving forward, here are the questions he wants to open up. I don't know if I could understand it clearly in the Tagalog version -

Now, ito tanong ko sa inyo.
1. Noong binuhay ng Dios ng INC si Cristo at umakyat sa langit. Dios ba sya ngayon dun sa langit? Anong talata.😊

Yeah, sure let's answer that and will. I'll give my reference answer and at the same time, I'll throw some questions to make it more even -

My answer is Yes, here are my opinion -
1. Can a mere(Human) man sit on God's throne? - Hebrews 1:8, 12:2
2. Did Stephen say they have a difference in glory between Christ and God? Whom did he call to receive his spirit? - Acts 7:55-59
3. If he is still a man, what kind of Glory does he have while sitting with God? Did God share his Glory? - Isaiah 42:8, 48:11
4. Will he still die? If not, then what kind of Human doesn't die? -Additional Question

2. Sa panahon ba natin ngayon, nahayag na bang muli si Cristo?anong talata?

This could be on a different topic, but it's a good question. But anyway, let's try that. Here's my opinion below -

If you're talking about his second coming, of course not. No man knoweth when will he comes again only the Father. Don't misunderstand that line. The father is superior to him, which means He is the one who holds the plan as to when will be the second coming. But if you're talking about the restoration, in which INC also has the same doctrine of restoration, then My answer is yes, and let's get basic scriptures about it -

God will not do anything without a prophet, and of course, in your doctrine, you call it a messenger. - Amos 3:7. The only difference was, that Christ never manifested to Felix and restored His Church.

Waiting for ur answers. Thanks!✌

- Done

Comment Section

Back to Top

Comment down below using your Facebook account. Don't Hesitate to contact me anytime, you can visit my other social media account to Learn more about Me.