Neil Andi Anderson: Bigots failure 1

Let's see how Neil Andi Anderson Got the right biblical doctrine and their so-called prophecy of Felix Manalo. Already without wasting too much time let's dive in. Comments are in red -

(Responding to someone, Name withheld) Nasa propesiya po, di lang isa ang propesiya tungkol kay FYM kundi maraming propesiya tungkol sa taong nagmula sa halayong silangan o Pilipinas kung tatawagin sa ating panahon. So he's saying that it is not just one prophecy but there are a couple of Prophecies about Felix yet on our previous review it wasn't a prophecy about him. He fail miserably about it and yet still insist it was Felix Manalo or the Church of Christ in the Philippines. Alright, let try and see how he made that claim. Di lang matanggap sa tao ang mga panukala tungkol sa kanya. Kung sa panahon man ni Cristo marami ding mga Hudyo na hindi naniwala kay Jesus paano pa kaya kay FYM na siyay isang hamak na tao na mula lamang sa hindi mayamang bansa? Pero ang mga panukala ay natupad at ang lahat ng pangako tungkol sa kanyang bayan na sabi ng bibliya na isang "bayang di pinabayaan" Now, he tries to compare Felix Prophecy like Christ who was rejected in his own land, and there's a catch, the so-called prophecy and promises about him was fulfilled. 🤔? where in the world was it fulfilled? I don't see one but rather a self claim prophecy using biblical text that has nothing to do about him. 

At tatawagin nila sila Ang banal na bayan, Ang tinubos ng Panginoon: at ikaw ay tatawagin Hinanap, Bayang hindi pinabayaan. (Isaias 62:12 TLAB) Kaya di maiikubli na ang INC ngayon ay siyang pinakamabilis na lumago na kahit sa panahon ng pandemic itoy nakakapag-aning maraming kaluluwa.  Are you sure about that? 🤔 The promise of God has already done to His own nation. Which nation are you referring to? 🇮🇱 or 🇵🇭 

Isaiah's word about the covenanted people Israel was promised to be redeemed, during Isaiah's time Israel was in bondage but the Lord never forsake his people. Though the verse is Generally saying something about the future even of the Covenanted people and the redemption they received after all the hardships. So the question is, does it says something about INC in the Philippines? Just because the word was used such as "end of the world", "the City not forsaken", "the Holy People" it doesn't mean the people in the Philippines, I am patriotic but I would never claim it is the country that I would suggest to someone in terms of biblical study. It is too poor to claim and argue with a valid source of study. Here' the complete words from Isaiah 62:10-12 and see for yourself and take note of the Word that they always use as their basis. It'll be easier to understand the context if you start from the very beginning of the chapter, you'll realize that it was addressed to the people of Israel as the Lord's Covenanted People.

10 ¶ Go through, go through the gates; prepare ye the way of the people; cast up, cast up the highway; gather out the stones; lift up a standard for the people.

11 Behold, the Lord hath proclaimed unto the end of the world, Say ye to the daughter of Zion, Behold, thy salvation cometh; behold, his reward is with him, and his work before him.

12 And they shall call them, The holy people, The redeemed of the Lord: and thou shalt be called, Sought out, A city not forsaken.

At madali mong makilala ang totoong sugo dahil sa kanyang mga turo dahil lahat itoy nakasulat sa banal na kasulatan walang dagdag o binabawasan. Miserably Fail, Christ said by their fruits ye shall know them, it is not about by their preachings. Everyone can claim they have the right doctrine and they taught everything in the Bible as their source of teaching, but what about the calling and right authority? Neil just don't know what the scripture was all about, he simply missed the important detail to know the Prophets if it is of God or the Devil. Nice try but try a little bit harder next time. Ihambing mo sa mga nag-aangkin diyan na may mga propeta daw sila pero kung sukatin man nating ang kanilang mga itinuro ay lubhang kultotismo ang dating, minsan naakit ang mga taong marupok sa pagsusuot ng kanilang miracle bahag. And here goes the Red Herring Fallacy, He assumes that garments as his main concern were unbiblical, seriously? You try to mix up something that focused the attention on different subjects. Nice diversion though, but sorry, your concern is already answered, I'll post that here and call your attention to it in my next post. Kaya dito lang sa kanilang mga inaawit ay nakakatawa na. 🙄 Seems like your running out of Criticisms. The best thing that a fool can give is to fool himself. Sorry, I'm not one of yours. Kaya kayong naakit sa mormonismo, we are inviting you to listen what the INC had preached and compare it in your cult church. If I'm not a Mormon and happened to read this kind of senseless junk, I would rather choose a different religion than listening to a childish talk. No thanks. 

My response to his post.
Change my mind.
But he can't.

Neil Andi Anderson: Bigots failure 1

Let's see how Neil Andi Anderson Got the right biblical doctrine and their so-called prophecy of Felix Manalo. Already without wasting too much time let's dive in. Comments are in red -

(Responding to someone, Name withheld) Nasa propesiya po, di lang isa ang propesiya tungkol kay FYM kundi maraming propesiya tungkol sa taong nagmula sa halayong silangan o Pilipinas kung tatawagin sa ating panahon. So he's saying that it is not just one prophecy but there are a couple of Prophecies about Felix yet on our previous review it wasn't a prophecy about him. He fail miserably about it and yet still insist it was Felix Manalo or the Church of Christ in the Philippines. Alright, let try and see how he made that claim. Di lang matanggap sa tao ang mga panukala tungkol sa kanya. Kung sa panahon man ni Cristo marami ding mga Hudyo na hindi naniwala kay Jesus paano pa kaya kay FYM na siyay isang hamak na tao na mula lamang sa hindi mayamang bansa? Pero ang mga panukala ay natupad at ang lahat ng pangako tungkol sa kanyang bayan na sabi ng bibliya na isang "bayang di pinabayaan" Now, he tries to compare Felix Prophecy like Christ who was rejected in his own land, and there's a catch, the so-called prophecy and promises about him was fulfilled. 🤔? where in the world was it fulfilled? I don't see one but rather a self claim prophecy using biblical text that has nothing to do about him. 

At tatawagin nila sila Ang banal na bayan, Ang tinubos ng Panginoon: at ikaw ay tatawagin Hinanap, Bayang hindi pinabayaan. (Isaias 62:12 TLAB) Kaya di maiikubli na ang INC ngayon ay siyang pinakamabilis na lumago na kahit sa panahon ng pandemic itoy nakakapag-aning maraming kaluluwa.  Are you sure about that? 🤔 The promise of God has already done to His own nation. Which nation are you referring to? 🇮🇱 or 🇵🇭 

Isaiah's word about the covenanted people Israel was promised to be redeemed, during Isaiah's time Israel was in bondage but the Lord never forsake his people. Though the verse is Generally saying something about the future even of the Covenanted people and the redemption they received after all the hardships. So the question is, does it says something about INC in the Philippines? Just because the word was used such as "end of the world", "the City not forsaken", "the Holy People" it doesn't mean the people in the Philippines, I am patriotic but I would never claim it is the country that I would suggest to someone in terms of biblical study. It is too poor to claim and argue with a valid source of study. Here' the complete words from Isaiah 62:10-12 and see for yourself and take note of the Word that they always use as their basis. It'll be easier to understand the context if you start from the very beginning of the chapter, you'll realize that it was addressed to the people of Israel as the Lord's Covenanted People.

10 ¶ Go through, go through the gates; prepare ye the way of the people; cast up, cast up the highway; gather out the stones; lift up a standard for the people.

11 Behold, the Lord hath proclaimed unto the end of the world, Say ye to the daughter of Zion, Behold, thy salvation cometh; behold, his reward is with him, and his work before him.

12 And they shall call them, The holy people, The redeemed of the Lord: and thou shalt be called, Sought out, A city not forsaken.

At madali mong makilala ang totoong sugo dahil sa kanyang mga turo dahil lahat itoy nakasulat sa banal na kasulatan walang dagdag o binabawasan. Miserably Fail, Christ said by their fruits ye shall know them, it is not about by their preachings. Everyone can claim they have the right doctrine and they taught everything in the Bible as their source of teaching, but what about the calling and right authority? Neil just don't know what the scripture was all about, he simply missed the important detail to know the Prophets if it is of God or the Devil. Nice try but try a little bit harder next time. Ihambing mo sa mga nag-aangkin diyan na may mga propeta daw sila pero kung sukatin man nating ang kanilang mga itinuro ay lubhang kultotismo ang dating, minsan naakit ang mga taong marupok sa pagsusuot ng kanilang miracle bahag. And here goes the Red Herring Fallacy, He assumes that garments as his main concern were unbiblical, seriously? You try to mix up something that focused the attention on different subjects. Nice diversion though, but sorry, your concern is already answered, I'll post that here and call your attention to it in my next post. Kaya dito lang sa kanilang mga inaawit ay nakakatawa na. 🙄 Seems like your running out of Criticisms. The best thing that a fool can give is to fool himself. Sorry, I'm not one of yours. Kaya kayong naakit sa mormonismo, we are inviting you to listen what the INC had preached and compare it in your cult church. If I'm not a Mormon and happened to read this kind of senseless junk, I would rather choose a different religion than listening to a childish talk. No thanks. 

My response to his post.
Change my mind.
But he can't.