Debate Result with Jose Rodelio Retome Rata (a.k.a. REBUKER )

Conclusion

As the debate rules and format were presented, the debate began on May 25, 2026, on the subject “The Reason for the Crucifixion of Christ.” Jose Rodelio Retome Rata took the position that Christ claimed the title “Son of God” while my position was that the plausible cause of blasphemy was Christ’s claim of equality with God.

He presented a list of verses, believing they would dismiss the matter. However, he failed to follow several debate rules, including engaging in diversion and attempting to pull the discussion into unrelated topics that he did not even understand in context.

I initiated the first question, which he answered with irrelevant opinions. And when I questioned him the second time, he failed to respond and instead insisted on taking his turn to ask questions without following the debate format and rules. Eventually, he left the debate and conceded defeat.

Since he refused to continue, I addressed the matter to conclude the debate. He then deleted the nested comment section, effectively destroying the evidence of the discussion.

In conclusion, and by default, Jose Rodelio Retome Rata, also known as “THE REBUKER,” Lost the debate.

Below was the debate rules and format with some screenshot -

Formal Debate Outline
Topic: “The Reason for the Crucifixion of Christ”

Debaters and Positions
Jose Rodelio Retome Rata (INC Position) - Christ claimed the title “Son of God.”
Jerry N. Bustillo (LDS Position) - Plausible cause of blasphemy: Christ claimed equality with God.

Debate Structure

Part I – INC Presentation

Opening Statement (INC)
Cross-Examination
Up to ten (10) questions from the LDS side

Part II – LDS Presentation

Opening Statement (LDS)
Cross-Examination
Up to ten (10) questions from the INC side

Part III – Analysis and Commentary

INC Commentary
Response and analysis based on the LDS presentation
LDS Commentary
Response and analysis based on the INC presentation

Part IV – Audience Participation

Five (5) selected questions from the audience directed to the INC side
Five (5) selected questions from the audience directed to the LDS side
Questions must be based on the prior analysis and discussion

Part V – Closing Statements

Closing Statement (INC)
Closing Statement (LDS)

Debate Rules and Guidelines

1. Each presentation must contain at least 400 words (or 2,000 characters) or fewer, without excessive quotations, external criticisms, or copied materials.
2. No ad hominem attacks are allowed (no name-calling, insults, or provocations).
3. No red herring arguments (no diversion, misdirection, or irrelevant points).
4. Stay on topic. Strawman arguments are prohibited.
5. In the question-and-answer portion only, each side may cite one or two Scripture passages, with explanation. Scripture flooding is not allowed.
• Suggested length: 250–300 words (or 1,000 characters or fewer).
• If more space is needed, request moderator approval in advance.
6. Closed or polar questions are allowed, provided they include a brief supporting statement when necessary.
7. Quoting or appealing to external speakers, authors, or doctrinal authorities is not permitted.
8. All questions must be based directly on the opponent’s presentation and must not change the subject.
9. Use a single comment thread or nested reply, posted only after the moderator’s cue.
10. Responses should be given within 24 hours, subject to each party’s availability.
11. Audience members may comment but must not intervene or debate the subject.
• Deleting comments is prohibited.
• Editing one’s own statement is allowed only with moderator approval.

1. Moderator Authority:
• If the discussion becomes excessively heated or unproductive, the moderator may pause or end the debate, declare a position based on clear assertions, or require a revised format.
2. Final Decision:
• The moderator will render a conclusion based on careful biblical exegesis from both sides.
• The finalized debate may be archived by either party.
• Copies of the full discussion will be retained in the moderator’s records.

A request to Moderate that I posted on the Group asking from the INC side.