Alright we are now on our next episode of ANSWERING JERRY BUSTILLO’S FLAWED REBUTTAL and we are on the Part 7 titled "IMMATURE AND INDECENT APPROACH?" So without further adeu lets get to it so we could finish this episode as quick as we could since Ginoong Pantas has other objective in dealing with the Mormons. Let's dive in -
“𝙄𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙖𝙞𝙢 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙖 𝙜𝙤𝙤𝙙 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙛𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜, 𝙄’𝙢 𝙜𝙤𝙤𝙙 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙞𝙩. 𝙔𝙤𝙪 𝙘𝙖𝙣 𝙜𝙤 𝙖𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙙 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙪𝙥 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙖 𝙙𝙞𝙨𝙘𝙪𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣. 𝙄 𝙙𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙣𝙤𝙧𝙢𝙖𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙙𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙥𝙪𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙡𝙮, 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙄 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙠𝙨 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙨𝙤 𝙞𝙢𝙢𝙖𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙞𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙘𝙚𝙣𝙩.”
𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐏𝐎𝐍𝐒𝐄: You actually failed to validate your claim (and misrepresentation of our doctrine) from the very start, yet you boast about being skilled in engaging with “verified teaching”? That is nothing but internal hypocrisy.And another thing: why are you so afraid of me posting this publicly on my timeline? Explain to me how that is “immature” or “indecent.” Is that really how Facebook timelines were designed by Meta?
Why would I validate my claim on just your side of your story, Ginoong Pantas? And how was my claim contradict on your INC doctrine? Who do you think is hypocrite here, Ginoong Pantas? The one that is just neutral or your style of just having your own religious teachings to be acknowledge? Why would I care digging on your website and find a good solution just to fix the problem of Leonid Meteor Shower and Brother Felix Manalo? Why would I do that? You want an explanation of why I don't normally post on a public just to show off my very own handiworks of a Professional Debater, or should I say the Magnum Opus of a Scripture Savvy Nerdo, was it that you're thinking, Ginoong Pantas? Why would I need to brag myself and level down my standards on such a stupid childish game of hate and bigotry? Tell me, why would I join you? What's your best outstanding professional approach to convince me to get in to your level?
NO. I chose to bring this matter to public attention on my timeline precisely for proper awareness and scrutiny, before your post in that group MISLEADS others through its blatant misrepresentation of our teachings. As simple as that!
I never mislead someone from your INC company of any of your teachings. I may post something that contradicts but it is not misleading rather a response to some of your arrogant cohorts. If you want it on the public, Go ahead, Do you think I do care? As long as you keep the entire conversation and the transparency to the public then go. Also always keep that in mind that I never posted something that mislead you and others on the group. Go ahead and take all my post in the group and have a case study, how, when and why I posted something on Facebook opposed on your INC view. Everything was there and lets deal with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment