Part 6 - ANSWERING JERRY BUSTILLO’S FLAWED REBUTTAL: Leonid Meteor subject - by Ginoong Pantas (ALLEGEDLY AGREEING ON HIS STATEMENT)

So here we are again in our next episode of the  ANSWERING JERRY BUSTILLO’S FLAWED REBUTTAL and we are on the Part 6  which is ALLEGEDLY AGREEING ON HIS STATEMENT. So let's talk about it Ginoong Pantas and will try to see which part of my Statement that you're talking about. Let check out if this falls into a category of your so-called misrepresentation of your doctrine. Just as usual text in Blue will be Ginoong Pantas and the normal text will be mine along with some quoted lines of my previous response will be Gray. Okay, let's go -

“𝘼𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣, 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙘𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙧 𝙞𝙣 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙙𝙨 “𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙤𝙘𝙞𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙” 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙘𝙝 𝙄 𝙙𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙮 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙘𝙝 𝙘𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙢. 𝘽𝙪𝙩 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙬𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚, 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙮 𝙖𝙜𝙧𝙚𝙚𝙨 𝙤𝙣 𝙢𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙢𝙚𝙣𝙩. 𝙄𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙄𝙉𝘾 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙖𝙧𝙚 𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙮𝙚𝙩 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙚𝙭𝙖𝙜𝙜𝙚𝙧𝙖𝙩𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙄 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙜𝙞𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙙𝙞𝙛𝙛𝙚𝙧𝙚𝙣𝙘𝙚. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙎𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙝-𝙙𝙖𝙮 𝘼𝙙𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙨𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙪𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙖𝙨 𝙥𝙖𝙧𝙩 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙞𝙗𝙡𝙞𝙘𝙖𝙡 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙝𝙚𝙘𝙮 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙣𝙤 𝙦𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙤 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩. 𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙣𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙄 𝙨𝙚𝙚 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙤𝙛 𝙢𝙮 𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙄 𝙜𝙪𝙚𝙨𝙨 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙗𝙡𝙚𝙢 𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚.”

𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐏𝐎𝐍𝐒𝐄: If you believe the INC’s doctrines do not concern you, then you should not have wasted time mentioning them in your so‑called FUN FACT post, especially when you neither understand them nor care about them in the first place. For the record, we do not deny that there are other religious institutions that share our interpretation of the prophecy in Revelation 6:12-13, but that is irrelevant here. What matters is not religious difference, but your misrepresentation of our doctrines. Your post was not ambiguous, and you cannot fault me for interpreting it exactly as you presented it in that Facebook group. You wanted it to be “interesting,” didn’t you? Well, where has that brought you now?

Why not Ginoong Pantas? I'm giving you a favor and you want me to keep it silence while every INC Apologist are using it? What's actually your point in calling me out on your misinterpretation? So, you don't deny that the same event were even used on some other religious organization as I have said the last time and also in the LDS circle, so what's your point? Yeah I get it, religious difference doesn't matter in this issue which I do agree, but telling me that I misrepresent your doctrine, JUST WHEN? The main issue here is that you misunderstood my statement and that you went on hysterical on such a matter that was taken out of context. Was it how you build relationship on others faith Ginoong Pantas? Do you INC people were trained that way? And so far most of the INC members as I could tell base on their individual comments and experiences are even war freak when some religious people tries to post online on their beliefs. And to tell you honestly Ginoong Pantas, those are the reasons why I got engage in an online discussions because of INC folks making fun of Catholicism and even on other religion. So was it how you people got that teachings from your leader that whenever someone posted something of their faith and if it seems opposed on your side then you have to take an unprofessional action just to satisfy your ego? Tell me more about it Ginoong Pantas? Back to the topic, and again, you haven't pointed out which part that I did was wrong, it was just your misinterpretations thinking I was mocking on your doctrine which I didn't even brought up.

“𝘼𝙜𝙖𝙞𝙣, 𝙄’𝙢 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙩𝙖𝙡𝙠𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙗𝙤𝙪𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙄 𝙙𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙘𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙪𝙜𝙤 𝙤𝙛 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝. 𝙔𝙤𝙪 𝙨𝙞𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙮 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙣 𝙢𝙮 𝙋𝙤𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙙𝙤𝙣’𝙩 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚. 𝙒𝙝𝙮 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙖𝙘𝙘𝙚𝙥𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙛𝙖𝙘𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙥𝙚𝙤𝙥𝙡𝙚 𝙠𝙣𝙤𝙬 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙖𝙢𝙚 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣𝙩? 𝙏𝙚𝙡𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙢𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙤𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙬𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙜𝙞𝙣𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙈𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙤𝙧 𝙬𝙝𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙘𝙖𝙡𝙡 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙖𝙙𝙙𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙩 𝙞𝙨 𝙞𝙧𝙧𝙚𝙡𝙚𝙫𝙖𝙣𝙩, 𝙄 𝙙𝙞𝙙𝙣'𝙩 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙦𝙪𝙤𝙩𝙚 𝙤𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜𝙨 𝙮𝙤𝙪𝙧 𝙘𝙝𝙪𝙧𝙘𝙝 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝙘𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙢?”

𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐏𝐎𝐍𝐒𝐄: There you go… you openly admitted that YOU DO NOT KNOW anything about Brother Felix Manalo’s divine mission as God’s Messenger. Then why did you dare to mention, or worse, make fun of the 1833 Leonid Meteor Shower as if it were one of the supposed signs of the Church’s emergence in the Philippines under his leadership, when you clearly have no understanding of his divine task? Correcting misrepresentation is never an overreaction, it is a necessary response. If you misunderstood my motive in addressing your distorted view of our doctrine, then I strongly suggest you first learn what the INC truly teaches before attempting to mock our teachings again.

You're right? The very reason why we got a group so we could engage in a healthy discussion, and look what we got here, Ginoong Pantas? So every time I engage with you it seem you're taking it as a mock on your side. Seriously, Ginoong Pantas? And how did I just make Fun of the 1833 Leonid Meteor Shower. Just because I use the word FUN so automatically you took it as a mock, making fun, or a Spoof on your religion? REALLY? The only thing that I know it was fun that coincidentally the same prophetic event that you and some other used which is the Leonid Meteor Storm was that it was fulfilled by Joseph Smith's word, and it turns out you never like it because the Mormons were involve on your so-called Felix Manalo's Preparation on Ministry, am I right, Ginoong Pantas? Again Ginoong Pantas, and I wish this is clear to you, the issue was not about the Felix Manalo's movement, it was all about on a certain event that has been used overtime; get in to it already, will you, Ginoong Pantas? And again, I have no problem on my post, it was your interpretation and misunderstanding. Stick on to that, Ginoong Pantas.

Coming up Next - Part 7 IMMATURE AND INDECENT APPROACH? only here at http://bit.ly/GPantas