Kung nagbabasa ka lang sana ng Biblia, Marites… hindi ka mahihirapang hagilapin ang sagot sa tanong mong iyan.👎Pero sige, sino nga ba ang nagsabi, at kanino galing ang katotohanang ang BIBLIA ay KUMPLETO at para sa IKAKUKUMPLETO ng mga hinirang ng Diyos na lubusang bumabatay ng aral mula rito?
Ang Biblia mismo ang may sabi niyan:
“Even when you were a child, you already knew the message of the Bible. The Bible has taught you how you can be truly wise. You understand that God saves you because you believe in Christ Jesus. EVERYTHING THAT IS WRITTEN IN THE BIBLE COMES FROM GOD’S SPIRIT. It helps us in many ways. THE BIBLE TEACHES US WHAT IS TRUE. It warns us when we are doing wrong things. It shows us what is right. It teaches us how to live good lives.” (2ⁿᵈ Timothy 3:15-16, ᴇᴇʙ)
Okay, so tell me the context of the verses that you posted? Who was the speaker, and to whom was it addressed? And tell me, what's Paul referring to in this writing during this statement? Can you tell me what it is, Ginoong Pantas?
Let me answer that question for you, Ginoong Pantas, then tell me if I'm wrong using the same context of this passage.
“Every scripture inspired of God is also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness: that the man of God may be COMPLETE, FURNISHED COMPLETELY unto every good work.” (2ⁿᵈ Timothy 3:16-17, ᴇʀᴠ)
So when Paul told Timothy about the scriptures, does this automatically mean the entire Bible of our times? Really? This is the same eisegesis even outside INC ideology, and still, you're using the same type of argument.
Ngayon, ikaw naman Marites. ANO ang matibay mong patotoo na BUKOD SA BIBLIA ay may iniuutos pa ang Diyos, o si Cristo, o ang mga Apostol, na MAGBATAY sa mga literaturang OUTSIDE the canonized portions of the Holy Scriptures, gaya ng Book of Mormon at ng Pearl of Great Price?🙂 Sana lang ay masagot mo iyan nang makatotohanan.
Thinking that she can't prove anything, does it mean you have quoted the right context of the scripture, Ginoong Pantas? Just when did Christ and the apostles say that this was all about the Bible that we use in our days?
Let's take a look at this example from the scriptures that Christ quoted -
Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me - John 5:39
When Christ quoted this, did it mean it was the entire Bible, or was it the available writings during Christ's time? Take note that the scriptures during Christ's ministry were no other than the Tanakh, which is composed of Torah, Nevi'im, and Ketuvim, and those were the only primary sources of their writings that they quoted often. Now, riddle this, Ginoong Pantas: How come Christ said that those writings were the source from which they could think about eternal life? Why did Christ use the old writings will be the guide to their salvation, and yet we don't have the New Testament in the same time period, Ginoong Pantas? Paul was not even known or called yet during this time. So yes, we are not talking about the whole Bible here, Ginoong Pantas. Not even John, who wrote the revelations, said anything about the Bible as the final authority. This simply shows that you don't know your scripture well, Ginoong Pantas, and I would suggest studying it more fully rather than going around social media, scattering your ideology that you don't even know the context.
No comments:
Post a Comment