So here we are again on the issue where Ginoong Pantas can't hardly accept that he misunderstood the statement and clearly his understanding did exceed it's limit because of bigotry. But we will get to it as long as he keeps it then lets just stay to just a simple subject that he foolishly won't accept. Also I made your text blue so you can easily see that part of your commentary, the rest will be my own and some others such as links and emphasis.
ANSWERING JERRY BUSTILLO’S FLAWED REBUTTALIt’s been over a week now since I last logged into Facebook, and I sincerely apologize to anyone (especially, Jerry) who may have been waiting for my response. My schedule has been quite demanding lately, making it difficult for me to stay active on social media. Thank you for your understanding.
Anyway, for a quick recap, it all began when Jerry Nuñez Bustillo, a self-styled Mormon apologist, posted what he called a “FUN FACT” in a Facebook group named The Restored Truths. In his post, he tagged nearly every member of the group and claimed that one of the doctrines of the INC allegedly teaches that the 1833 Leonid Meteor Shower was a divine sign heralding the emergence of the Church in the Philippines under Bro. FYM’s leadership.
And look what we got here, you still focused on the part where my statement is clear that it was indeed your doctrine as if the event as plain as it is. So let's repost that "Fun Fact" that you misunderstood badly. Look closely how you badly misinterpret my statement. This simply shows that your understanding either biblical or outside scriptural text might be full of misinterpretations and cherry picking ideology.
@everyone Fun Fact that might interest you. One of the doctrines or teachings of INC that has been taught as one of the fulfillments of Bro Felix Manalo was the signs of how the church in the Philippines emerges. One of those signs is the 1833 Meteor Shower, or as they call it, the 1833 Leonid Meteor Storm, referencing it in Revelation 6:12-13, if I'm not mistaken. But here's the interesting part. Joseph Smith predicted the exact date when it would appear. I haven't made an article on this one yet, and I'm still working on my blog, but here's one from the Joseph Smith Foundation on that article. You can also search an independent site relating to this topic and find out how it happened. Thanks everyone, and Good night.
Did you catch it? Or you're still buffering? See where you missed the part. I did not say that it was indeed the only doctrine, which I was talking about general doctrine or should we say fulfilment, and here you are bubbling with your own ideology that has been simply misunderstood. Do you INC people really look at the text that way?
Although his post hardly merits serious attention (despite his claim that it “might interest” readers) I still found it troubling. The way he framed it suggests a blatant misrepresentation of what the Iglesia Ni Cristo actually teaches. That was enough reason for me to respond publicly with a post on my own timeline.
Oh yeah sure "THE SERIOUS ATTENTION" stuff that I don't even bother thinking that it was a serious matter of misunderstanding the context. So, how did I misrepresent the Iglesia Ni Cristo where I only doing you a favor? My post clearly suggest that your so-call SUGO in the Philippines has a ground of his very own prophecy and that I even made it simple and state that it did happen. So you want attention? Go ahead and include this part where you misinterpret the context of my statement.
Well, I suggest visiting his post and mine for a fair evaluation before going all through the content of this post.
Sure, I am making this on a different part so I can clearly address your misinterpretations of my text that you don't even bother looking on the bright side. Let's get to it shall we?
Now, after realizing that I had called him out and corrected his misunderstanding of one of the alleged doctrines of the Iglesia Ni Cristo, Jerry went on to write a rebuttal on his blog, which, from the looks of it, might even be owned by his family. Here is the entirety of his attempt to refute my critique.
Yeah sure "Corrected my Misunderstanding" which plainly says you misunderstood my statement. And thank you for taking the link of my blog on such a matter where you think the family owned blog says it all. Just to shorten the blog if you think it's too long you can go ahead using this link instead.
Moving on. As we engage in the more part of your blog. Take note that I already made up my stand that you misinterpret and misunderstood my statement, this alone proves everything. But yeah sure will get to every detail of your post.
Some portions of his rebuttal on that blog are already addressed in the screenshots provided below. However, the rest (particularly the more attention-grabbing and pressing points) will be dealt with here. I will tackle them one by one.
And the Screenshot, don't worry I will add it soon after we get those part. So far as the introduction goes, I just leave it as it is.
COMING UP - Part 2 THE OBVIOUS CONTRADICTION
No comments:
Post a Comment