 |
| Mula sa original comment ni Neil Andi Anderson sa ibang Group. |
Ok, so here's the Text and since it is a mixed topic, I'll add a direct response on each subject. -
Jerry Nuñez Bustillo If you don't believed that he is the fulfillment of all prophecies that mention of his task then believed of what he preached for it is all biblical.
This was actually his response to my comments about Felix Manalo their Sugo, he simply cannot sustain and defend his Sugo and how he was supposed to be Sugo. So far, as to end it, he simply shift to different topic diverting this to some issues as he thinks it was. Will let's go ahead to see some of it Neil Andi Anderson.
Remember not water but 'katas ng ubas"
Which he simple refered to sacrament emblems of wine which represents the blood of Christ. Unfortunately, there's no such thing as "katas ng Ubas" wine either or Grape but rather the scripture use the symbol as Cup. So here are the list of scriptural reference -
Matthew 26:27 And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;
Mark 14:23 And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.
Luke 22:20 Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.
And so as in 1 Corinthians 11:23-26, but let's be straight and fair since I'm an LDS and not a Biased INC. Wine was normally use in administering the sacrament and it was even in Joseph Smith's time as recorded in Doctrine and Covenants 20:79, this also the same element used in the Book of Mormon as recorded in 3 Nephi 18:1-8 during Christ Visit in America which was also used in Moroni 4-5 where D&C 20:77,79 quoted it directly. So how it was change? Okay to help you understand Neil Andi Anderson and since you said you're a former LDS who doesn't know anything about it, I'll give you some Ensight to help you remember.
Joseph Smith received a revelation that led to the change from wine to water for the sacrament. This instruction is found in the Doctrine and Covenants, Section 27. In this revelation, the Lord emphasized the importance of the purpose and intent behind the sacrament rather than the specific elements used. It says in Doctrine and Covenants 27:2
For, behold, I say unto you, that it mattereth not what ye shall eat or what ye shall drink when ye partake of the sacrament, if it so be that ye do it with an eye single to my glory—remembering unto the Father my body which was laid down for you, and my blood which was shed for the remission of your sins.
The revelation was practical, encouraging Saints to focus on the ordinance's symbolic significance and ensuring safety from any impurities in wine that might be obtained from unreliable sources. This change underscores the principle that it's the remembrance of Christ and the covenants made with Him that are most important in the sacrament ordinance. So now you know Neil Andi Anderson.
And here's the biblical symbol of its changes to help you understand Neil Andi Anderson.
In John 19:34, it states:
But one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and forthwith came there out blood and water.
Now look at that, coincidence Neil?
Walang KOLOB sa bibliya parekoy
Obviously, we didn't quote anything that it was in the Bible. If you're really a former LDS you already know that. So far there's nothing to talk about if your referring this to as biblical and so we don't. Sorry, you might be confused.
at lalong walang TITHING sa Bagong Tipan.
Wrong! Christ was the High Priest after the order of Melchizedek in Which Abraham paid his tithes directly to Him (Melchizedek). Christ has the same Holy Priesthood so the Law has changed from Levitical to Melchizedek Priesthood (Hebrew 7). Read your bible Again Neil Andi Anderson.
Again it is Christ statement that "NO EVER SEEN GOD AT ANYTIME"contrary of what the other maniacols that GOD can be seen same as a man.
First of All it was John as the writer who said it, And obviously, you don't know what his statement as clearly as the context goes.
If you try to read about those verses prior to it, you will come to notice that the laws of God were presented through prophets like Moses, and of course Moses saw God face to face and not just him but many others who can confirm God's existence. So, the question remains, was it God the Father or someone else? Will, let's find it out biblically Neil Andi Anderson.
But anyways, let's take a look at the context and read it carefully as we can to help you understand what it meant.
John 1:18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
Did you catch it? Let's try this once again in different version. I actually remove some translation to avoid too much redundancy. If you want to check it out, visit on this link at https://biblehub.com/john/1-18.htm.
- New International Version - No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.
- New Living Translation - No one has ever seen God. But the unique One, who is himself God, is near to the Father’s heart. He has revealed God to us.
- English Standard Version - No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known.
- Berean Standard Bible - No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is Himself God and is at the Father’s side, has made Him known.
- Berean Literal Bible - No one has ever yet seen God. The only begotten God, the One being in the bosom of the Father, He has made Him known.
- New American Standard Bible - No one has seen God at any time; God the only Son, who is in the arms of the Father, He has explained Him.
- NASB 1995 - No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.
- Legacy Standard Bible - No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, He has explained Him.
- Amplified Bible - No one has seen God [His essence, His divine nature] at any time; the [One and] only begotten God [that is, the unique Son] who is in the intimate presence of the Father, He has explained Him [and interpreted and revealed the awesome wonder of the Father].
- Christian Standard Bible - No one has ever seen God. The one and only Son, who is himself God and is at the Father’s side —he has revealed him.
- Holman Christian Standard Bible - No one has ever seen God. The One and Only Son— the One who is at the Father’s side— He has revealed Him.
- Contemporary English Version - No one has ever seen God. The only Son, who is truly God and is closest to the Father, has shown us what God is like.
- GOD'S WORD® Translation - No one has ever seen God. God's only Son, the one who is closest to the Father's heart, has made him known.
- Good News Translation -No one has ever seen God. The only Son, who is the same as God and is at the Father's side, he has made him known.
- International Standard Version - No one has ever seen God. The unique God, who is close to the Father's side, has revealed him.
- NET Bible - No one has ever seen God. The only one, himself God, who is in closest fellowship with the Father, has made God known.
- Webster's Bible Translation - No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.
- Weymouth New Testament - No human eye has ever seen God: the only Son, who is in the Father's bosom--He has made Him known.
ΚΑΤΑ ΙΩΑΝΝΗΝ 1:18 Greek NT: Nestle 1904 - Θεὸν οὐδεὶς ἑώρακεν πώποτε· μονογενὴς Θεὸς ὁ ὢν εἰς τὸν κόλπον τοῦ Πατρὸς, ἐκεῖνος ἐξηγήσατο.
Now look at that Neil Andi Anderson? Was it all about Christ as God thing? Or maybe no since you don't believe that Christ exist with the Father. Unfortunately the bible itself is against on your teaching.
Moving forward, let's check out how he concludes it.
Mormon hanggang kamatayan pa rin kahit ang dami ko nang isiniwalat na mali.
Sorry but you fail miserably and this time it all goes against your ideology. Thank you and have a nice day.