Debunking Job Bautista in his Criticisms about the Promise Land ideology and some MADEUP STORY.

Job Bautista appears to be struggling with his comprehension of LDS theology in some online social networks, as evidenced by his increasingly erratic behavior. He shares stories that seem too good to be true, yet he genuinely believes in their validity. While I typically refrain from addressing such poorly articulated criticism, it may provide insight into why he is causing a stir across social media platforms with his fabrications and misconceptions. By examining these narratives, we may gain a better understanding of the underlying factors that have propelled him into the spotlight for all the wrong reasons. Let's take a closer look at some of these instances to unravel the truth behind Job Bautista's online presence and the impact of his misleading statements. His words below - 

Breaking news sa mga Lds church members ; inamin na ng bulaang propeta na nalinlang lang daw sila ng kanilang ama na isang hangal , na guni-guni ng kanyang puso at inakay daw sila papalabas sa Jerusalem. 600BC. daw ay naglakbay daw sila mula Jerusalem papunta daw ng America na siyang new Jerusalem para sa kanila . Ether Chapter 13. Kinopya ang kasaysayan ni Noe na gumawa ng Daong . Ang Family ng bulaang propeta naman daw ay gumawa din ng sasakyan dagat o barko . 1 Nephi 18:22-23 , 1 Nephi 18:8 -9 nakarating daw sila sa lupang pangako ( America ) Ether chapter 13 . Sagana daw doon ng kalaswaan at polygamy rituals isinasagawa . Katunayan meron 40 na asawa ang kanilang Propeta na si Joseph Smith .

This is too poor to be a criticism, but lets deal with it since Job Bautista wants to learn new things and he wants to understand what really happened during those time that he mentioned. He never knew what context is, so basically he just loved cherry pick verse for the content, and yet it ended up arrogantly fail.

Let's sum up his concerns in bullets so we could address it directly to his Understanding. Comments will be after each bullets. 

  • Inamin na ng bulaang propeta na nalinlang lang daw sila ng kanilang ama na isang hangal , na guni-guni ng kanyang puso at inakay daw sila papalabas sa Jerusalem. 600BC. daw ay naglakbay daw sila mula Jerusalem papunta daw ng America na siyang new Jerusalem para sa kanila.
1 Nehpi 17: 20 And thou art like unto our father, led away by the foolish imaginations of his heart; yea, he hath led us out of the land of Jerusalem, and we have wandered in the wilderness for these many years; and our women have toiled, being big with child; and they have borne children in the wilderness and suffered all things, save it were death; and it would have been better that they had died before they came out of Jerusalem than to have suffered these afflictions

Job Bautista simply think his cheery-picked verse was all about a prophet being deceived but looking at the context, the one who speaks is not actually a prophet. It was Nephi's older brethren who didn't believe the words of their Father Lehi. The writer only records the events and narration of his history, in which Job Bautista fails to analyze. Some part of it for your study below Job Bautista (1 Nephi 17:17-19) -

17 And when my brethren saw that I was about to build a ship, they began to murmur against me, saying: Our brother is a fool, for he thinketh that he can build a ship; yea, and he also thinketh that he can cross these great waters.
18 And thus my brethren did complain against me, and were desirous that they might not labor, for they did not believe that I could build a ship; neither would they believe that I was instructed of the Lord.
19 And now it came to pass that I, Nephi, was exceedingly sorrowful because of the hardness of their hearts; and now when they saw that I began to be sorrowful they were glad in their hearts, insomuch that they did rejoice over me, saying: We knew that ye could not construct a ship, for we knew that ye were lacking in judgment; wherefore, thou canst not accomplish so great a work.

After reading the verses, it's obvious that the words were spoken by his older brother who disagreed with Nephi and their father, Lehi. They were told to build a ship to sail across the ocean. The verses show a family disagreement, with the older brother opposing the plan to construct the ship. This disagreement reveals a family conflict, highlighting different opinions within the family. The older brother's refusal to build the ship shows a lack of unity and understanding among family members. It portrays a moment of tension and disagreement, illustrating the challenges Nephi and his family faced during their journey. The verses depict the complexities of family dynamics and individual beliefs during a crucial decision-making process.

So, was the question Job Bautista referred to has significant to the actual context? I guess no. Carefully reading and understanding the context will help you learn the right situation of the even, and Job Bautista here simply shows his lack of ability to comprehend the text.

  • Ether Chapter 13. Kinopya ang kasaysayan ni Noe na gumawa ng Daong.
I don't understand how building a ship could be compared to Noah's story. Noah was told to build an ark to save himself, his family, and animals from a flood. Lehi's family building a ship to reach a promised land happened around 600 BC. During that time, people knew what ships, boats, and arks looked like. They were familiar with Noah's story, so it wasn't a new concept. I don't see any reason to think they were copying the ark story for a different purpose. It seems unrelated and doesn't make sense.
  • Ang Family ng bulaang propeta naman daw ay gumawa din ng sasakyan dagat o barko. 1 Nephi 18:22-23 , 1 Nephi 18:8 -9 nakarating daw sila sa lupang pangako (America)
As my explaination goes, This is not actually new concept during their times. So it doesn't make any sense in questioning something historically correct. You may go ahead and rephrase your question.
  • Ether chapter 13. Sagana daw doon ng kalaswaan at polygamy rituals isinasagawa.
It appears that there is a misunderstanding regarding polygamous rituals in Ether 13, as I have not come across such references either. The individual in question seems to be blending elements of Joseph Smith's life with certain practices in a manner that suggests confusion or a lack of familiarity with the Book of Mormon and its context. It seems like a case where information has been haphazardly picked up without a thorough understanding, leading to a presentation that may seem intriguing on the surface but lacks coherence when examined within the proper framework. To Job Bautista, I would suggest conducting separate research on the topic to offer constructive criticism rather than presenting a jumbled history that fails to convincingly portray the intended message. Such behavior can be perceived as disrespectful and unchristian, especially if one claims to adhere to Christian values. It is essential to refrain from engaging in disrespectful actions if one wishes to be associated with Christian principles. By approaching discussions with respect and a genuine desire to understand, one can contribute meaningfully to the discourse without resorting to rudeness or misrepresentation. So Job Bautista, don't be a jerk. It's my challenge to you, if you want to go on with the topic of Polygamy, then stop making up storied that doesn't e even on the context. I would suggest do it in separate post.
  • Katunayan meron 40 na asawa ang kanilang Propeta na si Joseph Smith.

Yes, I thought this was correct, but it seems like you've misunderstood. You're mixing up things to make them more appealing to readers, but it's not accurate in a sense if we're dealing with the Book of Mormon History. Joseph Smith's life and the context of the Book of Mormon are unrelated. The Book of Mormon advises having one wife to prevent problems like those experienced by David and Solomon with multiple wives. However, this doesn't mean it supports polygamy. The Book of Mormon teaches that having only one spouse is the best way to have a successful marriage and avoid the issues that can arise from having more than one partner. But on the issue of Joseph Smith and Polygamy were not relevant to the theme you're trying to brought up. As my suggestion goes, try posting it in separate post or article.

Below are some of the lines from the Book of Mormon that doesn't agree nor disagree the practice of Polygamy, rather as whatever God's well it's all up to Him as long as you're keeping His commandments and covenants.

Jacob 2 
23 But the word of God burdens me because of your grosser crimes. For behold, thus saith the Lord: This people begin to wax in iniquity; they understand not the scriptures, for they seek to excuse themselves in committing whoredoms, because of the things which were written concerning David, and Solomon his son. 
24 Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the Lord
25 Wherefore, thus saith the Lord, I have led this people forth out of the land of Jerusalem, by the power of mine arm, that I might raise up unto me a righteous branch from the fruit of the loins of Joseph. 
26 Wherefore, I the Lord God will not suffer that this people shall do like unto them of old. 
27 Wherefore, my brethren, hear me, and hearken to the word of the Lord: For there shall not any man among you have save it be one wife; and concubines he shall have none
28 For I, the Lord God, delight in the chastity of women. And whoredoms are an abomination before me; thus saith the Lord of Hosts. 
29 Wherefore, this people shall keep my commandments, saith the Lord of Hosts, or cursed be the land for their sakes
30 For if I will, saith the Lord of Hosts, raise up seed unto me, I will command my people; otherwise they shall hearken unto these things.

In verse 30, it is stated that God can instruct His people to have descendants who follow Him. If God commanded polygamy, it would be His decision, but during that time, God advised against it. Job Bautista tried to distort the history of the Book of Mormon by falsely claiming that the people in it, who journeyed from Israel to Ancient America, practiced polygamy, which is untrue. Bautista's account contradicts the actual teachings of the Book of Mormon. The verse emphasizes that God's commands determine the practices of His people, and in this case, polygamy was not endorsed. Bautista's attempt to alter the narrative of the Book of Mormon is misleading and inaccurate. It is crucial to rely on authentic sources and accurate accounts when interpreting historical events. The verse serves as a reminder of the importance of understanding and following God's teachings faithfully, without misinterpretation or distortion.

Nice try Job Bautista, but you fail. Thank you and have a nice day. 

More post like this just visit www.bustillo-family.blogspot.com thank you for your time.

Comments

Check out the rest of my blog post at www.bustillo-family.blogspot.com