And here's another part after my little response he made a long comment adding Ad hominem and Red Hiring and let's see some of the other Fallacy of this INC Bigot. Let's dive in. Red Text as my comments -
Jerry Nuñez Bustillo Ayan nagpapakita ka na naman sa pagkakamoron mo, sige nga pakita mo na isang bible scholar si Smith para belib din ako. Here's an example of Appeal to Ignorance, Joseph never claims a scholar and No one does even to this day.
 |
| From fallacyinlogic.com Click on the link to learn more about Fallacy |
He is not even good at writing and got no format education until his 3rd grade. This does not mean that an educated man is the required proof of Joseph as a prophet, as Christ said "by their fruits, ye shall know them", he never said by their intelligence or educational institutions and knowledge. This guy fail miserably the last time and this was his another strike. For more information on Joseph Smith’s history, check out the link after this post, and of course, will add Manalo's History to complete their claim, I'll post that on a different blog post next time.
Alam mo ang mga isinugo ng Diyos ay di sa pamamagitan kung ang tao bay punong puno ng karunongan, bagkus pinili niya ang tao na gusto niya dahil siya din ang magtuturo tulad kay Moises. Okay, so I guess you agreed with my comments about your so-called show proof. That is weird though while making such a claim.
Sa panahon ni Cristo karamihan ng mga napipili niyang tutulong sa kanyang pangangaral ay karaniwang tao lamang. Yes, so true and Felix Manalo as your doctrine claim is an Angel, not an ordinary man. Manalo even studies Theology in a known university. So no, he's well learned to claim an unlearned man, he can easily twist writings for gain. Huwag mong ihambing ang bible scholars sa mga taong isinugo ng Diyos dahil malaking pagkakaiba diyan moron na Mormon. Yes sure, so there's no need to discuss if you disagree with your claim, And who do you call moron that even you cant debunk my words. You can't prove me wrong while I can easily prove how stupid your claims are. So, Naive. Sa mga isinugo lamang maihayag ang hiwaga at ipinakilala sa lahat ng bansa. And how do you claim he "Felix Manalo" was called when you can't even prove it in a short sentence, his call, and how God told him to spread his words. ZERO, as in empty.25 At ngayon sa kaniya na makapangyarihan na sa inyo'y makapagpapatibay ayon sa aking evangelio at sa pangangaral ni Jesucristo, ayon sa pahayag ng hiwaga na natago sa katahimikan nang panahong walang hanggan.
26 Datapuwa't nahayag na ngayon, at sa pamamagitan ng mga kasulatan ng mga propeta, ayon sa ipinagutos ng Dios na walang hanggan, ay ipinakilala sa lahat ng mga bansa upang magsitalima sa pananampalataya:
27 Sa iisang Dios na marunong, sa pamamagitan ni Jesucristo, na sumasa kaniya ang kaluwalhatian magpakailan man. Siya nawa.
And here you are posting something that has nothing to do with the subject. Christ The Son of God was of course sent by God the Father to perform the atoning sacrifice. and because he was sent, he must have a physical body and leave his glory to fulfill his mission. Your weak understand proves that you know nothing about Christ. This proves how you people look at Christ as no other than a mere man.
............................................................................................................................................................
Mahalagang Tiyakin ng tao kung ang tagapangaral na kaniyang pinakikinggan ay sinugo ng Diyos. Ang mga sugo ng Diyos ang makapagtuturo ng tunay na kaalaman tungkol sa Diyos(Mal. 2:7, MBB),
Malachi 2:7For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.
- Was Felix called of God?
- When did he receive his Authority?
- When did God talk to him?
- When did he receive revelations, visions, or divine intervention?
Felix Y. Manalo, born on May 10, 1886, in Taguig, Philippines, was baptized in the Catholic Church. In his teenage years, Manalo became dissatisfied with Catholic theology. According to the National Historical Commission of the Philippines, the establishment of the Philippine Independent Church (also called the Aglipayan Church) was his major turning point, but Manalo remained uninterested since its doctrines were mainly Catholic. In 1904, he joined the Methodist Episcopal Church, entered the Methodist seminary, and became a pastor for a while. He also sought through various denominations, including the Presbyterian Church, Christian Mission, and finally Seventh-day Adventist Church in 1911. Manalo left Adventism in 1913 and associated himself with atheist and agnostic peers.
In November 1913, Manalo secluded himself with religious literature and unused notebooks in a friend's house in Pasay, instructing everyone in the house not to disturb him. He emerged from seclusion three days later with his new-found doctrines. Manalo, together with his wife, went to Punta, Santa Ana, Manila, in November 1913 and started preaching. He left the congregation in the care of his first ordained minister and returned to his native Taguig to evangelise; there, he was ridiculed and stoned at his meetings with locals. He was later able to baptize a few converts, including some of his persecutors. He later registered his new-found religion as the Iglesia ni Cristo (English: Church of Christ; Spanish: Iglesia de Cristo) on July 27, 1914, at the Bureau of Commerce as a corporation sole, with himself as the first executive minister. Expansion followed as INC started building congregations in the provinces in 1916, with Pasig (then in Rizal province) having two locals established. The first three ministers were ordained in 1919.